Literature DB >> 24328899

Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume.

Emma Hansson1, Jonas Manjer, Anita Ringberg.   

Abstract

Breast volume measurement is valuable in clinical practice, and various methods have been used. Nonetheless, no commonly accepted standard technique exists for clinical everyday use and there is no optimal method that is quick, cheap, minimally invasive, and acceptable for the patient and for the surgeon. Previously, a study has shown that the volume measured with plastic cups differed little from that measured from mastectomy specimens. The aim of the present study was to test the reliability of breast volume measurements with plastic cups as a tool to measure breast volume in everyday clinical practice. The plastic cups were designed by the senior author (AR) and comprise 14 cups from 125 millilitres (ml) to 2000 ml. Six raters measured 12 breasts on the same day. The results show that there is a certain variation between different raters, and that a certain rater seems to consistently measure slightly lower or higher volumes than the other raters. The Intra Class Correlation (ICC) coefficient of average measures between raters is 0.89, that is, the agreement between different raters is high. According to the Bland-Altman plot, the overall assessment of the comparisons of measurements between the different raters shows that the direction of the mean differences is close to zero. The limits of agreements of the differences were within ±56 ml. The coefficient of variation (CV) between different raters was 14%. Breast volume measurement with plastic cups is an easily usable quick and cheap way to measure breast volume in everyday clinical practice. The measurements have an acceptable reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast volume; breast measurement; breast surgery; plastic cups; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24328899     DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.870908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 2000-6764


  6 in total

1.  Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery Can Benefit from the Opportunity to Participate in Choosing Their Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jonas Manjer; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Patient Self-reported Breast Cup Size and Resultant Mastectomy Specimen Weight: Implications for Reconstructive Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Perez; Sumeet S Teotia; Nicholas T Haddock
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-11

3.  Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Ragıp Kayar; Özgül V Çilengiroğlu
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jonas Manjer; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jenny Heiman Ullmark; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Cosmetic Outcomes and Symmetry Comparison in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Therapeutic Mammoplasty for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  K Gulis; L Rydén; P O Bendahl; T Svensjö
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.