Bridgit Burns1, Kate Grindlay, Kelsey Holt, Ruth Manski, Daniel Grossman. 1. At the time of the study, Bridgit Burns, Kate Grindlay, Kelsey Holt, and Ruth Manski were with Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA. Daniel Grossman is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, and the Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored qualitatively US servicewomen's experiences with and perceptions of military sexual trauma (MST), reporting, and related services. METHODS: From May 2011 to January 2012, we conducted 22 telephone interviews with US servicewomen deployed overseas between 2002 and 2011. We analyzed data thematically with modified grounded theory methods. RESULTS: Factors identified as contributing to MST included deployment dynamics, military culture, and lack of consequences for perpetrators. Participants attributed low MST reporting to negative reactions and blame from peers and supervisors, concerns about confidentiality, and stigma. Unit cohesion was cited as both a facilitator and a barrier to reporting. Availability and awareness of MST services during deployment varied. Barriers to care seeking were similar to reporting barriers and included confidentiality concerns and stigma. We identified several avenues to address MST, including strengthening consequences for perpetrators. CONCLUSIONS: We identified barriers to MST reporting and services. Better understanding of these issues will allow policymakers to improve MST prevention and services.
OBJECTIVES: We explored qualitatively US servicewomen's experiences with and perceptions of military sexual trauma (MST), reporting, and related services. METHODS: From May 2011 to January 2012, we conducted 22 telephone interviews with US servicewomen deployed overseas between 2002 and 2011. We analyzed data thematically with modified grounded theory methods. RESULTS: Factors identified as contributing to MST included deployment dynamics, military culture, and lack of consequences for perpetrators. Participants attributed low MST reporting to negative reactions and blame from peers and supervisors, concerns about confidentiality, and stigma. Unit cohesion was cited as both a facilitator and a barrier to reporting. Availability and awareness of MST services during deployment varied. Barriers to care seeking were similar to reporting barriers and included confidentiality concerns and stigma. We identified several avenues to address MST, including strengthening consequences for perpetrators. CONCLUSIONS: We identified barriers to MST reporting and services. Better understanding of these issues will allow policymakers to improve MST prevention and services.
Authors: S M Frayne; K M Skinner; L M Sullivan; T J Tripp; C S Hankin; N R Kressin; D R Miller Journal: J Womens Health Gend Based Med Date: 1999 Jul-Aug
Authors: Rachel Kimerling; Amy E Street; Joanne Pavao; Mark W Smith; Ruth C Cronkite; Tyson H Holmes; Susan M Frayne Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Shauna Stahlman; Marjan Javanbakht; Susan Cochran; Alison B Hamilton; Steven Shoptaw; Pamina M Gorbach Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2015-05-14
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Warren B P Pettey; Marjorie E Carter; Emily Brignone; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; Guy Divita; Rebecca K Blais; Jamison D Fargo; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2020-03-04
Authors: Adi V Gundlapalli; Emily Brignone; Guy Divita; Audrey L Jones; Andrew Redd; Ying Suo; Warren B P Pettey; April Mohanty; Lori Gawron; Rebecca Blais; Matthew H Samore; Jamison D Fargo Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2017