Literature DB >> 24327933

RON promotes the metastatic spread of breast carcinomas by subverting antitumor immune responses.

Henok Eyob1, Huseyin Atakan Ekiz, Alana L Welm.   

Abstract

The MSP/RON signaling pathway favors the conversion of micrometastatic lesions to overt metastases by suppressing antitumor immune responses. The loss of RON functions in the host potentiates tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, hence inhibiting the outgrowth of metastatic cancer cells. Thus, RON inhibitors may potentially prevent the outgrowth of micrometastases in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD8+ T-cell response; MSP; RON; TNF; antitumor immunity; immunotherapy; metastasis; tumor dormancy; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2013        PMID: 24327933      PMCID: PMC3850023          DOI: 10.4161/onci.25670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The metastatic spread of primary lesions to distant organs is the main cause of death from cancer. Although the conversion of dormant micrometastatic cancer cells into overt metastases is a critical and therapeutically relevant point in disease progression, the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underpin this conversion remain unclear. Immunosurveillance appears to play a key role in this process. Thus, T lymphocytes appear to prevent the escape of micrometastatic cancer cells from dormancy in many tumor models. However, how micrometastatic cells suppress the immune system to enable metastatic outgrowth is largely unknown. Therefore, identifying and targeting pathways that are employed by neoplastic cells to subvert antitumor immune responses during metastatic outgrowth is particularly important, as the prevention of early metastatic dissemination may not be clinically feasible. Macrophage stimulating 1 (hepatocyte growth factor-like) (MS1), also known as macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP), is a glycoprotein released from the liver into the blood as an inactive precursor, and is activated locally on macrophages upon cleavage by the macrophage protease suppression of tumorigenicity 14 (colon carcinoma) (ST14, best known as matriptase). Upon cleavage, activated MSP can bind to its receptor, macrophage stimulating 1 receptor (c-met-related tyrosine kinase) (MST1R, also known as RON), which is expressed by epithelial cells, osteoclasts, and macrophages. The MSP/RON signaling axis generally promotes cell proliferation, survival, and chemotaxis. Although mice lacking Msp or Ron exhibit no obvious developmental defects, they are susceptible to toxic shock upon infection or injury due to the inability of their macrophages to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines while upregulating anti-inflammatory ones., Thus, the MSP/RON signaling axis is critical for the regulation of immune responses to external insults. RON has also been reported to play a role in a wide range of human cancers. ST14 and RON are overexpressed in around 45% and 50% of human breast carcinomas, respectively. Moreover, the co-overexpression of MSP, ST14, and RON constitutes an independent prognostic factor for metastasis and death among breast carcinoma patients. We have previously reported that the overexpression of MSP in MMTV-PyMT mice (which spontaneously develop breast carcinoma upon the mammary gland-specific expression of the polyomavirus middle T antigen, PyMT) promotes the metastatic spread of neoplastic lesions to a wide range of organs, including lungs, lymphatic vessels, bones, and the spleen. However, it was unclear whether the MSP/RON signaling axis would contribute to metastasis through cell-intrinsic mechanisms or by modulating inflammation. To dissect the cell-intrinsic vs. cell-extrinsic role of MSP/RON in metastasis, we performed tissue complementation experiments in the MMTV-PyMT mouse model. In particular, we overexpressed MSP in RON-expressing MMTV-PyMT cancer cells, and transplanted them orthotopically into wild-type (WT) or Ron hosts. Although tumor growth was similar in WT and Ron animals, the loss of host RON abrogated pulmonary metastasis. We determined that the absence of metastasis was actually due to the inability of micrometastatic cancer cells to generate macrometastases. In turn, such a defect in metastatic outgrowth exhibited by Ron mice was due to enhanced antitumor CD8+ T-cell responses. CD8+ T cells from Ron hosts secreted higher levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and exerted more robust cytolytic activity in vitro than their WT counterparts. Importantly, adoptively transferred Ron CD8+ T cells efficiently blocked the metastatic outgrowth of micrometastatic cancer cells, while WT CD8+ T cells did not. Conversely, both the genetic and the pharmacological ablation of CD8+ T cells was sufficient to restore the capacity of breast carcinoma cells to form macrometastases in Ron mice. The inhibition of RON with BMS-777607 (also known as ASLAN002), a selective inhibitor of its tyrosine kinase activity, reduced metastatic outgrowth, both in prophylactic and adjuvant settings. Significantly, the antimetastatic activity of BMS-777607 relied on CD8+ T cells, as this molecule completely lost its efficacy in the context of CD8+ T-cell depletion. Altogether, our findings reveal a novel pathway that malignant cells harness to suppress immune responses during metastatic outgrowth (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. RON signaling suppresses antitumor CD8+ T-cell responses. (A) The binding of cancer cell-derived macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP) to RON stimulated myeloid cells to produce decreased levels of interleukin (IL)-12, interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) as well as increased amounts of IL-10. This cytokine profile suppresses antitumor CD8+ T cell responses and enables micrometastatic cancer cells to generate macrometastases. (B) The loss of RON signaling in the host, be it caused by genetic or pharmacological interventions, switches cytokine secretion by myeloid cells to a profile characterized by high levels of IL-12, IFNγ, and TNFα as well as by reduced amount of IL-10. This relieves immunosuppression, potentiating an antitumor CD8+ T-cell response that kills micrometastatic tumor cells.

Figure 1. RON signaling suppresses antitumor CD8+ T-cell responses. (A) The binding of cancer cell-derived macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP) to RON stimulated myeloid cells to produce decreased levels of interleukin (IL)-12, interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) as well as increased amounts of IL-10. This cytokine profile suppresses antitumor CD8+ T cell responses and enables micrometastatic cancer cells to generate macrometastases. (B) The loss of RON signaling in the host, be it caused by genetic or pharmacological interventions, switches cytokine secretion by myeloid cells to a profile characterized by high levels of IL-12, IFNγ, and TNFα as well as by reduced amount of IL-10. This relieves immunosuppression, potentiating an antitumor CD8+ T-cell response that kills micrometastatic tumor cells. Immunosubversion is a critical step in tumor progression. The microenvironment of primary neoplastic lesions is particularly immunosuppressive, featuring increased levels of cytokines and mediators that inhibit CD8+ T-cell responses, such as arginase and interleukin (IL)-10. However, tumor cells that have invaded a new microenvironment may be more vulnerable to immunosurveillance. Based on our recent findings, we propose that some cancer cells may upregulate MSP as an additional mechanism to evade antitumor immune responses. Moreover, our data demonstrate that RON is important for immunosuppression even when tumors do not overexpress MSP, perhaps reflecting the activation of circulating MSP by macrophage- and/or tumor-derived serine proteases. The detailed molecular mechanisms whereby the MSP/RON signaling axis suppresses antitumor immunity are still unknown. Based on previously findings and our recent results, RON appears to favor the polarization of macrophages toward the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype. Alternatively, the pharmacological or genetic inhibition of RON may result in the widespread establishment of a pro-inflammatory cytokine milieu that contains high levels of IL-12 and TNFα and hence boosts CD8+ T-cell responses. Additional genetic models of impaired RON signaling are required to dissect the precise molecular mechanisms that underlie our observations. Although RON inhibitors are currently explored as targeted cytotoxic agents, our findings suggest that these chemicals may also exert therapeutically relevant immunostimulatory effects. Thus, the clinical success of RON inhibitors may require a careful design of clinical trials, the selection of specific patient cohort and the development/exploitation of immunological biomarkers. In conclusion, we propose that the inhibition of the MSP/RON signaling axis may be an exciting addition to the growing armamentarium of cancer immunotherapies.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cancer despite immunosurveillance: immunoselection and immunosubversion.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Antoine Tesniere; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  The macrophage stimulating protein/Ron pathway as a potential therapeutic target to impede multiple mechanisms involved in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Kelsi L Kretschmann; Henok Eyob; Saundra S Buys; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.465

3.  Ron-mediated cytoplasmic signaling is dispensable for viability but is required to limit inflammatory responses.

Authors:  S E Waltz; L Eaton; K Toney-Earley; K A Hess; B E Peace; J R Ihlendorf; M H Wang; K H Kaestner; S J Degen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Vesely; Michael H Kershaw; Robert D Schreiber; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 28.527

5.  Activation of the stem cell-derived tyrosine kinase/RON receptor tyrosine kinase by macrophage-stimulating protein results in the induction of arginase activity in murine peritoneal macrophages.

Authors:  Amy C Morrison; Pamela H Correll
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 6.  Potential therapeutics specific to c-MET/RON receptor tyrosine kinases for molecular targeting in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ming-Hai Wang; Snehal S Padhye; Sunny Guin; Qi Ma; Yong-qing Zhou
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Inhibition of ron kinase blocks conversion of micrometastases to overt metastases by boosting antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Henok Eyob; Huseyin Atakan Ekiz; Yoko S Derose; Susan E Waltz; Matthew A Williams; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  The macrophage-stimulating protein pathway promotes metastasis in a mouse model for breast cancer and predicts poor prognosis in humans.

Authors:  Alana L Welm; Julie B Sneddon; Carmen Taylor; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Marc J van de Vijver; Bruce H Hasegawa; J Michael Bishop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Macrophage-stimulating protein, the ligand for the stem cell-derived tyrosine kinase/RON receptor tyrosine kinase, inhibits IL-12 production by primary peritoneal macrophages stimulated with IFN-gamma and lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Amy C Morrison; Caleph B Wilson; Manujendra Ray; Pamela H Correll
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  New insights into tumor dormancy: Targeting DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Evans; Shiaw-Yih Lin
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-10

2.  Preclinical Efficacy of Ron Kinase Inhibitors Alone and in Combination with PI3K Inhibitors for Treatment of sfRon-Expressing Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Magdalena Bieniasz; Parvathi Radhakrishnan; Najme Faham; Jean-Paul De La O; Alana L Welm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Big opportunities for small molecules in immuno-oncology.

Authors:  Jerry L Adams; James Smothers; Roopa Srinivasan; Axel Hoos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Myeloid Cells as Targets for Therapy in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Tiziana Cotechini; Terry R Medler; Lisa M Coussens
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  A phase I trial to determine safety and pharmacokinetics of ASLAN002, an oral MET superfamily kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid cancers.

Authors:  Aflah Roohullah; Adam Cooper; Anna J Lomax; Jennifer Aung; Alan Barge; Lilian Chow; Mark McHale; Jayesh Desai; James R Whittle; Ben Tran; Paul de Souza; Lisa G Horvath
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Plasma Level of Placenta-Derived Macrophage-Stimulating Protein -Chain in Preeclampsia before 20 Weeks of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Yonggang Zhang; Hongling Yang; Yan Long; Qingling Ma; Ruihua Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  MST1R kinase accelerates pancreatic cancer progression via effects on both epithelial cells and macrophages.

Authors:  Michele L Babicky; Megan M Harper; Jeffery Chakedis; Alex Cazes; Evangeline S Mose; Dawn V Jaquish; Randall P French; Betzaira Childers; Hakan Alakus; Michael C Schmid; Phillippe Foubert; Jaclyn Miyamoto; Patrick J Holman; Zakkary J Walterscheid; Chih-Min Tang; Nissi Varki; Jason K Sicklick; Karen Messer; Judith A Varner; Susan E Waltz; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Trichomicin Suppresses Colorectal Cancer via Comprehensive Regulation of IL-6 and TNFα in Tumor Cells, TAMs, and CAFs.

Authors:  Xi Zhao; Xiaoqiang Qi; Wenrui Lian; Xin Tong; Hua Wang; Liya Su; Ping Wei; Zhuochen Zhuang; Jianhua Gong; Liping Bai
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Pathological significance of abnormal recepteur d'origine nantais and programmed death ligand 1 expression in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Zhi Liu; Da-Ting Han; Dan-Rong Shi; Bo Hong; Yun Qian; Zhi-Gang Wu; Shu-Hao Yao; Tao-Ming Tang; Ming-Hai Wang; Xiang-Ming Xu; Hang-Ping Yao
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-11-15

10.  OPN promotes the aggressiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer cells through the activation of the RON tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  Chengcheng Hao; Yuxin Cui; Siyuan Chang; Jing Huang; Emily Birkin; Mu Hu; Xiuyi Zhi; Wenbin Li; Lijian Zhang; Shan Cheng; Wen G Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.