Kim M Kiely1, Peter Butterworth. 1. Centre for Research on Ageing Health and Wellbeing, The Australian National University, , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The higher occurrence of common psychiatric disorders among welfare recipients has been attributed to health selection, social causation and underlying vulnerability. The aims of this study were to test for the selection effects of mental health problems on entry and re-entry to working-age welfare payments in respect to single parenthood, unemployment and disability. METHODS: Nationally representative longitudinal data were drawn from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Multiple spell discrete-time survival analyses were conducted using multinomial logistic regression models to test if pre-existing mental health problems predicted transitions to welfare. Analyses were stratified by sex and multivariate adjusted for mental health problems, father's occupation, socioeconomic position, marital status, employment history, smoking status and alcohol consumption, physical function and financial hardship. All covariates were modelled as either lagged effects or when a respondent was first observed to be at risk of income support. RESULTS: Mental health problems were associated with increased risk of entry and re-entry to disability, unemployment and single parenting payments for women, and disability and unemployment payments for men. These associations were attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for contemporaneous risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although we do not control for reciprocal causation, our findings are consistent with a health selection hypothesis and indicate that mental illness may be a contributing factor to later receipt of different types of welfare payments. We argue that mental health warrants consideration in the design and targeting of social and economic policies.
BACKGROUND: The higher occurrence of common psychiatric disorders among welfare recipients has been attributed to health selection, social causation and underlying vulnerability. The aims of this study were to test for the selection effects of mental health problems on entry and re-entry to working-age welfare payments in respect to single parenthood, unemployment and disability. METHODS: Nationally representative longitudinal data were drawn from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. Multiple spell discrete-time survival analyses were conducted using multinomial logistic regression models to test if pre-existing mental health problems predicted transitions to welfare. Analyses were stratified by sex and multivariate adjusted for mental health problems, father's occupation, socioeconomic position, marital status, employment history, smoking status and alcohol consumption, physical function and financial hardship. All covariates were modelled as either lagged effects or when a respondent was first observed to be at risk of income support. RESULTS: Mental health problems were associated with increased risk of entry and re-entry to disability, unemployment and single parenting payments for women, and disability and unemployment payments for men. These associations were attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for contemporaneous risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although we do not control for reciprocal causation, our findings are consistent with a health selection hypothesis and indicate that mental illness may be a contributing factor to later receipt of different types of welfare payments. We argue that mental health warrants consideration in the design and targeting of social and economic policies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cohort studies; Health inequalities; MENTAL HEALTH; Social and life-course epidemiology; UNEMPLOYMENT
Authors: Kim M Kiely; Liana S Leach; Sarah C Olesen; Peter Butterworth Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Evelina Landstedt; Anna Brydsten; Anne Hammarström; Pekka Virtanen; Ylva B Almquist Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Giles Greene; Andrea Gartner; Daniel Farewell; Lazlo Trefan; Alisha R Davies; Mark A Bellis; Shantini Paranjothy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elena Andreeva; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Hugo Westerlund; Töres Theorell; M Harvey Brenner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 3.295