Literature DB >> 24327619

Medication risk factors associated with healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection: a multilevel model case-control study among 64 US academic medical centres.

Amy L Pakyz1, Rachel Jawahar, Qin Wang, Spencer E Harpe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to determine patient- and hospital-level medication risk factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) occurrence among patients clustered within hospitals using a multilevel model.
METHODS: Patients with healthcare-associated (HA)-CDI were identified from among 64 academic medical centres in 2009. A frequency match was conducted; for each case, up to two controls were selected, matched on similar pre-infection length of stay and clinical service line. Patient- and hospital-level medication use, including antibacterial and gastric acid-suppressant agents, was assessed using a two-level logistic regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 5967 CDI cases and 8167 controls were included in the analysis. The odds of acquiring HA-CDI increased with the following medications [OR (95% CI)]: anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents [1.38 (1.22-1.56)]; third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins [1.75 (1.62-1.89)]; carbapenems [1.60 (1.44-1.79)]; β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations [1.49 (1.36-1.64)]; vancomycin [1.73 (1.57-1.89)]; and proton pump inhibitors [1.43 (1.30-1.57)]. The odds of acquiring HA-CDI decreased with the following medications: clindamycin [0.74 (0.63-0.87)]; and macrolides [0.88 (0.77-0.99)]. Controlling for patient-level covariates, no hospital-level medication covariates that we analysed had statistically significant effects on HA-CDI. The odds of acquiring HA-CDI increased with the hospital proportion of patients aged ≥ 65 years [1.01 (1.00-1.02)].
CONCLUSIONS: We found several medications that were associated with the risk of patients developing HA-CDI, including β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, vancomycin, proton pump inhibitors and anti-methicillin-resistant S. aureus agents. There were no medication effects significant at the hospital level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibacterial risk factors; healthcare-associated infections; proton pump inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24327619     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  14 in total

1.  Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of SYN-004, an Orally Administered β-Lactamase for the Prevention of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease and Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea, in Two Phase 1 Studies.

Authors:  Tracey Roberts; John F Kokai-Kun; Olivia Coughlin; Barbara Valero Lopez; Heidi Whalen; J Andrew Bristol; Steven Hubert; James Longstreth; Kenneth Lasseter; Joseph Sliman
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Alicia J Mangram; Joseph F Sucher; Victor Zach
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Magnitude and direction of the association between Clostridium difficile infection and proton pump inhibitors in adults and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tadayuki Oshima; Liping Wu; Min Li; Hirokazu Fukui; Jiro Watari; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  [Diagnostic workup and therapy of infectious diarrhea. Current standards].

Authors:  A Stallmach; S Hagel; A W Lohse
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Assessing the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection With Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa Arriola; Jessica Tischendorf; Jackson Musuuza; Anna Barker; Jeffrey W Rozelle; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Acid suppression therapy does not predispose to Clostridium difficile infection: the case of the potential bias.

Authors:  Lena Novack; Slava Kogan; Larisa Gimpelevich; Michael Howell; Abraham Borer; Ciarán P Kelly; Daniel A Leffler; Victor Novack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Probiotics are effective at preventing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine Sm Lau; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Clostridium difficile infection in Chilean patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Javier Pilcante; Patricio Rojas; Daniel Ernst; Mauricio Sarmiento; Mauricio Ocqueteau; Pablo Bertin; Maria García; Maria Rodriguez; Veronica Jara; Maria Ajenjo; Pablo Ramirez
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  The efficacy of intracolonic vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile colitis: a case series.

Authors:  Christine M Akamine; Michael B Ing; Christian S Jackson; Lawrence K Loo
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  When omeprazole met with asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization in a postoperative colon cancer patient: A case report.

Authors:  Boyu Li; Huachong Ma; Zhenjun Wang; Lihong Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.