BACKGROUND: Pathology in the long head of the biceps tendon often occurs in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopic tenotomy is the most common treatment. However, the role of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder and the consequences of surgical detachment on the remaining shoulder structures remain unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We hypothesized that detachment of the long head of the biceps, in the presence of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears, would decrease shoulder function and decrease mechanical and histologic properties of both the subscapularis tendon and the glenoid articular cartilage. METHODS: We detached the supraspinatus and infraspinatus or the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and long head of the biceps after 4 weeks of overuse in a rat model. Animals were gradually returned to overuse activity after detachment. At 8 weeks, the subscapularis and glenoid cartilage biomechanical and histologic properties were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and long head of the biceps group had a decreased change in braking and vertical force. [corrected]. This group also had an increased upper and lower subscapularis modulus but without any differences in glenoid cartilage modulus. Finally, this group had a significantly lower cell density in both the upper and lower subscapularis tendons, although cartilage histology was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Detachment of the long head of the biceps tendon in the presence of a posterior-superior cuff tear resulted in improved shoulder function and less joint damage in this animal model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence in an animal model that supports the use of tenotomy for the management of long head of the biceps pathology in the presence of a two-tendon cuff tear. However, long-term clinical trials are required.
BACKGROUND: Pathology in the long head of the biceps tendon often occurs in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopic tenotomy is the most common treatment. However, the role of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder and the consequences of surgical detachment on the remaining shoulder structures remain unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We hypothesized that detachment of the long head of the biceps, in the presence of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears, would decrease shoulder function and decrease mechanical and histologic properties of both the subscapularis tendon and the glenoid articular cartilage. METHODS: We detached the supraspinatus and infraspinatus or the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and long head of the biceps after 4 weeks of overuse in a rat model. Animals were gradually returned to overuse activity after detachment. At 8 weeks, the subscapularis and glenoid cartilage biomechanical and histologic properties were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and long head of the biceps group had a decreased change in braking and vertical force. [corrected]. This group also had an increased upper and lower subscapularis modulus but without any differences in glenoid cartilage modulus. Finally, this group had a significantly lower cell density in both the upper and lower subscapularis tendons, although cartilage histology was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Detachment of the long head of the biceps tendon in the presence of a posterior-superior cuff tear resulted in improved shoulder function and less joint damage in this animal model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence in an animal model that supports the use of tenotomy for the management of long head of the biceps pathology in the presence of a two-tendon cuff tear. However, long-term clinical trials are required.
Authors: Augustus D Mazzocca; Mary Beth R McCarthy; Felicia A Ledgard; David M Chowaniec; William J McKinnon; Steven Delaronde; Louis J Rubino; John Apolostakos; Anthony A Romeo; Robert A Arciero; Knut Beitzel Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: L J Soslowsky; S Thomopoulos; S Tun; C L Flanagan; C C Keefer; J Mastaw; J E Carpenter Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Katherine E Reuther; Stephen J Thomas; Joseph J Sarver; Jennica J Tucker; Chang-Soo Lee; Chancellor F Gray; David L Glaser; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Katherine E Reuther; Stephen J Thomas; Elisabeth F Evans; Jennica J Tucker; Joseph J Sarver; Sarah Ilkhani-Pour; Chancellor F Gray; Pramod B Voleti; David L Glaser; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Mengcun Chen; Snehal S Shetye; Julianne Huegel; Corinne N Riggin; Daniel J Gittings; Courtney A Nuss; Stephanie N Weiss; Andrew F Kuntz; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jennica J Tucker; Corinne N Riggin; Brianne K Connizzo; Robert L Mauck; David R Steinberg; Andrew F Kuntz; Louis J Soslowsky; Joseph Bernstein Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Zakary M Beach; Jennica J Tucker; Stephen J Thomas; Katherine E Reuther; Chancellor F Gray; Chang-Soo Lee; David L Glaser; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Biomech Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Stephen J Thomas; Joseph J Sarver; Sarah M Yannascoli; Jennica J Tucker; John D Kelly; Rexford S Ahima; Mary F Barbe; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 3.494