Susan E Buskin1, James B Kent, Julia C Dombrowski, Matthew R Golden. 1. From the *Public Health Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA; †Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and ‡Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA and Center for AIDS and STD, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevention and clinical efforts are increasingly focused on improving the HIV care cascade, the sequential steps from diagnosis to engagement in care and viral suppression. Monitoring of this cascade is largely dependent on HIV laboratory surveillance data. However, little is known about the completeness of these data or the true care status of individuals for whom no data are reported. METHODS: We investigated people presumed to be living with HIV/AIDS in King County, WA, who had no laboratory results reported to HIV surveillance for at least 1 year between 2006 and 2010. We determined whether each person had relocated, died, or remained in the county. RESULTS: Of 7379 HIV-infected people presumed living in King County, 2545 (35%) had 1 or more 12-month gap in laboratory reporting. Among these individuals, 47% had relocated, 7% died, and 38% remained in King County; we were unable to determine the status of 8%. Of individuals remaining in the area, 91% had evidence of returning to or being in HIV care. Case investigations reduced the proportion of individuals thought to be out of care in 2011 from 27% to 16%. CONCLUSIONS: Investigations of individuals without laboratory results reported to HIV surveillance identified large numbers of people who are no longer living in the area. Our findings suggest that current estimates of the HIV care cascade may be too pessimistic and that individual case investigations are required to accurately define the size and composition of the population of people living with HIV in local areas.
BACKGROUND: Prevention and clinical efforts are increasingly focused on improving the HIV care cascade, the sequential steps from diagnosis to engagement in care and viral suppression. Monitoring of this cascade is largely dependent on HIV laboratory surveillance data. However, little is known about the completeness of these data or the true care status of individuals for whom no data are reported. METHODS: We investigated people presumed to be living with HIV/AIDS in King County, WA, who had no laboratory results reported to HIV surveillance for at least 1 year between 2006 and 2010. We determined whether each person had relocated, died, or remained in the county. RESULTS: Of 7379 HIV-infectedpeople presumed living in King County, 2545 (35%) had 1 or more 12-month gap in laboratory reporting. Among these individuals, 47% had relocated, 7% died, and 38% remained in King County; we were unable to determine the status of 8%. Of individuals remaining in the area, 91% had evidence of returning to or being in HIV care. Case investigations reduced the proportion of individuals thought to be out of care in 2011 from 27% to 16%. CONCLUSIONS: Investigations of individuals without laboratory results reported to HIV surveillance identified large numbers of people who are no longer living in the area. Our findings suggest that current estimates of the HIV care cascade may be too pessimistic and that individual case investigations are required to accurately define the size and composition of the population of people living with HIV in local areas.
Authors: Michael J Mugavero; K Rivet Amico; Andrew O Westfall; Heidi M Crane; Anne Zinski; James H Willig; Julia C Dombrowski; Wynne E Norton; James L Raper; Mari M Kitahata; Michael S Saag Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Julia C Dombrowski; Mari M Kitahata; Stephen E Van Rompaey; Heidi M Crane; Michael J Mugavero; Joseph J Eron; Stephen L Boswell; Benigno Rodriguez; W Christopher Mathews; Jeffrey N Martin; Richard D Moore; Matthew R Golden Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Edward M Gardner; Margaret P McLees; John F Steiner; Carlos Del Rio; William J Burman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Martin R Frankel; Ad McNaghten; Martin F Shapiro; Patrick S Sullivan; Sandra H Berry; Christopher H Johnson; Elaine W Flagg; Sally Morton; Samuel A Bozzette Journal: Open AIDS J Date: 2012-09-07
Authors: Kobus Herbst; Matthew Law; Pascal Geldsetzer; Frank Tanser; Guy Harling; Till Bärnighausen Journal: Curr Opin HIV AIDS Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Njoroge Anne; Matthew D Dunbar; Felix Abuna; Peter Simpson; Paul Macharia; Bourke Betz; Peter Cherutich; David Bukusi; Farquhar Carey Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Joanna M Bove; Matthew R Golden; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Robert D Harrington; Julia C Dombrowski Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Julia C Dombrowski; Joanna Bove; James C Roscoe; Jessica Harvill; Caislin L Firth; Shireen Khormooji; Jason Carr; Peter Choi; Courtney Smith; Sean D Schafer; Matthew R Golden Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Katelynne Gardner Toren; Susan E Buskin; Julia C Dombrowski; Susan L Cassels; Matthew R Golden Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine R Lesko; Lynne A Sampson; William C Miller; Jacquelyn Clymore; Peter A Leone; Heidi Swygard; Kimberly A Powers Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731