Ye Ra Choi1, Se Hyung Kim2, Sun-Ah Kim1, Cheong-Il Shin3, Hyung Jin Kim1, Seong Ho Kim1, Joon Koo Han3, Byung Ihn Choi3. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea; The Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: shkim7071@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea; The Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify significant CT findings for the differentiation of large (≥ 5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) from benign subepithelial tumors and to assess whether radiologists' performance in differentiation is improved with knowledge of significant CT criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred twenty patients with pathologically proven large (≥ 5 cm) GISTs (n=99), schwannomas (n=16), and leiomyomas (n=5) who underwent CT were enrolled. Two radiologists (A and B) retrospectively reviewed their CT images in consensus for the location, size, degree and pattern of enhancement, contour, growth pattern and the presence of calcification, necrosis, surface ulceration, or enlarged lymph nodes. CT findings considered significant for differentiation were determined using uni- and multivariate statistical analyses. Thereafter, two successive review sessions for the differentiation of GIST from non-GIST were independently performed by two other reviewers (C and D) with different expertise of 2 and 9 years using a 5-point confidence scale. At the first session, reviewers interpreted CT images without knowledge of significant CT findings. At the second session, the results of statistical analyses were provided to the reviewers. To assess improvement in radiologists' performance, a pairwise comparison of receiver operating curves (ROC) was performed. RESULTS: Heterogeneous enhancement, presence of necrosis, absence of lymph nodes, and mean size of ≥ 6 cm were found to be significant for differentiating GIST from schwannoma (P<0.05). Non-cardial location, heterogeneous enhancement, and presence of necrosis were differential CT features of GIST from leiomyoma (P<0.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that absence of enlarged LNs was the only statistically significant variable for GIST differentiating from schwannoma. The area under the curve of both reviewers obtained using ROC significantly increased from 0.682 and 0.613 to 0.903 and 0.904, respectively, with information of the significant CT findings differentiating GISTs from non-GISTs (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Non-cardial location, heterogeneous enhancement, presence of necrosis, larger lesion size, and absence of lymphadenopathy are highly suggestive CT findings for large GISTs in differentiation from schwannomas or leiomyomas. Regardless of radiologists' expertise, diagnostic performance in differentiation can be significantly improved with knowledge of these CT findings.
PURPOSE: To identify significant CT findings for the differentiation of large (≥ 5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) from benign subepithelial tumors and to assess whether radiologists' performance in differentiation is improved with knowledge of significant CT criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred twenty patients with pathologically proven large (≥ 5 cm) GISTs (n=99), schwannomas (n=16), and leiomyomas (n=5) who underwent CT were enrolled. Two radiologists (A and B) retrospectively reviewed their CT images in consensus for the location, size, degree and pattern of enhancement, contour, growth pattern and the presence of calcification, necrosis, surface ulceration, or enlarged lymph nodes. CT findings considered significant for differentiation were determined using uni- and multivariate statistical analyses. Thereafter, two successive review sessions for the differentiation of GIST from non-GIST were independently performed by two other reviewers (C and D) with different expertise of 2 and 9 years using a 5-point confidence scale. At the first session, reviewers interpreted CT images without knowledge of significant CT findings. At the second session, the results of statistical analyses were provided to the reviewers. To assess improvement in radiologists' performance, a pairwise comparison of receiver operating curves (ROC) was performed. RESULTS: Heterogeneous enhancement, presence of necrosis, absence of lymph nodes, and mean size of ≥ 6 cm were found to be significant for differentiating GIST from schwannoma (P<0.05). Non-cardial location, heterogeneous enhancement, and presence of necrosis were differential CT features of GIST from leiomyoma (P<0.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that absence of enlarged LNs was the only statistically significant variable for GIST differentiating from schwannoma. The area under the curve of both reviewers obtained using ROC significantly increased from 0.682 and 0.613 to 0.903 and 0.904, respectively, with information of the significant CT findings differentiating GISTs from non-GISTs (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Non-cardial location, heterogeneous enhancement, presence of necrosis, larger lesion size, and absence of lymphadenopathy are highly suggestive CT findings for large GISTs in differentiation from schwannomas or leiomyomas. Regardless of radiologists' expertise, diagnostic performance in differentiation can be significantly improved with knowledge of these CT findings.