Literature DB >> 24325688

Influence of oversizing on outcome in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Jip L Tolenaar1, Frederik H W Jonker, Frans L Moll, Joost van Herwaarden, Mark D Morasch, Michel S Makaroun, Santi Trimarchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of stent-graft oversizing on device-related complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA).
METHODS: The study cohort was composed of patients enrolled in 4 clinical trials of the TAG thoracic stent-graft. A total of 337 TAA patients (222 men; mean age 72 years) treated in these trials had sufficient data for analysis of oversizing and post-procedure mortality and complications, such as endoleak, migration, rupture, and reinterventions. Mean oversizing at the proximal landing zone was 14.6% (range -3.4% to 39.7%). Patients were stratified based on the percentage of oversizing: <10% (n=85, group 1), 10%-20% (n=188, group 2), and >20% (n=64, group 3).
RESULTS: Patients in group 1 had significantly larger preoperative proximal aortic diameters (32.6 vs. 31.3 vs. 28.2 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and neck lengths (6.9 vs. 5.8 vs. 5.2 cm (p=0.035). Overall, type I endoleak was the most frequent complication during the first 30 days of follow-up (35, 10.4%), but the incidences did not differ among the 3 groups (10.6% vs. 11.2% vs. 7.8%, respectively; p=0.809). Over a mean follow-up of 41.8±20.7 months, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of device-related complications among the groups, though the incidence of type I endoleaks was lower in group 2 (9.4% vs. 3.2% vs. 7.8%, respectively; p=0.073). Cox proportional hazards modeling showed no difference in the time to type I endoleak among oversizing groups [group 1 vs. 2: HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.36 (p=0.509) and group 3 vs. 2: HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.60 (p=0.562)].
CONCLUSION: The percentage of oversizing did not significantly affect the incidence of device-related complications after TEVAR for TAA. Although oversizing may enhance the radial force and help maintain a good proximal seal, additional oversizing seemed not to improve the overall outcome in this analysis. The current guidelines regarding stent-graft oversizing for TAA seem appropriate, though the correct percentage remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24325688     DOI: 10.1583/13-4388MR.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

Review 1.  Imaging for surveillance and operative management for endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs.

Authors:  Christopher Lau; Dmitriy N Feldman; Leonard N Girardi; Luke K Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Endovascular Aortic Arch Reconstruction with Parallel Grafts: A Dilemma of Excessive Endograft Oversizing.

Authors:  Huey-Shiuan Kuo; Kun-Cheng Tsai; Jer-Shen Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Endovascular ascending aortic repair in type A dissection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yunus Ahmed; Ignas B Houben; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicholas S Burris; David M Williams; Frans L Moll; Himanshu J Patel; Joost A van Herwaarden
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Mid-Term Results of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection at a Single Center.

Authors:  Young Kwang Hong; Won Ho Chang; Dong Erk Goo; Hong Chul Oh; Young Woo Park
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

5.  Frozen elephant trunk repair of aortic aneurysms: How to reduce the incidence of endoleak and reintervention.

Authors:  Sandhir Kandola; Ahmed Abdulsalam; Mark Field; Robert K Fisher
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-06-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.