Literature DB >> 24325660

QuickView video preview software of colon capsule endoscopy: reliability in presenting colorectal polyps as compared to normal mode reading.

Michael J Farnbacher1, Horst H Krause, Alexander F Hagel, Martin Raithel, Markus F Neurath, Thomas Schneider.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) proved to be highly sensitive in detection of colorectal polyps (CP). Major limitation is the time-consuming video reading. The aim of this prospective, double-center study was to assess the theoretical time-saving potential and its possible impact on the reliability of "QuickView" (QV), in the presentation of CP as compared to normal mode (NM). METHODS. During NM reading of 65 CCE videos (mean patient´s age 56 years), all frames showing CPs were collected and compared to the number of frames presented by QV at increasing QV settings (10, 20, ... 80%). Reliability of QV in presenting polyps <6 mm and ≥6 mm (significant polyp), and identifying patients for subsequent therapeutic colonoscopy, capsule egestion rate, cleansing level, and estimated time-saving potential were assessed. RESULTS. At a 30% QV setting, the QV video presented 89% of the significant polyps and 86% of any polyps with ≥1 frame (per-polyp analysis) identified in NM before. At a 10% QV setting, 98% of the 52 patients with significant polyps could be identified (per-patient analysis) by QV video analysis. Capsule excretion rate was 74% and colon cleanliness was adequate in 85%. QV´s presentation rate correlates to the QV setting, the polyp size, and the number of frames per finding. CONCLUSIONS. Depending on its setting, the reliability of QV in presenting CP as compared to NM reading is notable. However, if no significant polyp is presented by QV, NM reading must be performed afterwards. The reduction of frames to be analyzed in QV might speed up identification of candidates for therapeutic colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24325660     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2013.865784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  6 in total

Review 1.  Video capsule endoscopy: perspectives of a revolutionary technique.

Authors:  Simon Bouchard; Mostafa Ibrahim; Andre Van Gossum
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases.

Authors:  Dan Carter; Rami Eliakim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

3.  Time-saving polyp detection in colon capsule endoscopy: evaluation of a novel software algorithm.

Authors:  Johannes Hausmann; Jan-Peter Linke; Jörg G Albert; Johannes Masseli; Andrea Tal; Alica Kubesch; Natalie Filmann; Michael Philipper; Michael Farnbacher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Overview of technical solutions and assessment of clinical usefulness of capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Booster medication to achieve capsule excretion in colon capsule endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial of three regimens.

Authors:  Rasmus Kroijer; Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig; Morten Kobaek-Larsen; Jens Overgaard Støvring; Niels Qvist; Gunnar Baatrup
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 6.  How should we do colon capsule endoscopy reading: a practical guide.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Konstantinos Dabos; Michael Philipper; Ervin Toth; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-03-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.