Literature DB >> 24325572

Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.

Azin Parsa1, Norliza Ibrahim, Bassam Hassan, Paul van der Stelt, Daniel Wismeijer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The first purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and calibrated radiographic bone density Hounsfield units (HU) in human jaws, derived from micro-CT and multislice computed tomography (MSCT), respectively. The second aim was to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in evaluating trabecular bone density and microstructure using MSCT and micro-CT, respectively, as reference gold standards.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty partially edentulous human mandibular cadavers were scanned by three types of CT modalities: MSCT (Philips, Best, the Netherlands), CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170, J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), and micro-CT (SkyScan 1173, Kontich, Belgium). Image analysis was performed using Amira (v4.1, Visage Imaging Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), 3Diagnosis (v5.3.1, 3diemme, Cantu, Italy), Geomagic (studio(®) 2012, Morrisville, NC, USA), and CTAn (v1.11, SkyScan). MSCT, CBCT, and micro-CT scans of each mandible were matched to select the exact region of interest (ROI). MSCT HU, micro-CT BV/TV, and CBCT gray value and bone volume fraction of each ROI were derived. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlations between corresponding measurement parameters.
RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed between CBCT and MSCT density (r = 0.89) and between CBCT and micro-CT BV/TV measurements (r = 0.82). Excellent correlation was observed between MSCT HU and micro-CT BV/TV (r = 0.91). However, significant differences were found between all comparisons pairs (P < 0.001) except for mean measurement between CBCT BV/TV and micro-CT BV/TV (P = 0.147).
CONCLUSIONS: An excellent correlation exists between bone volume fraction and bone density as assessed on micro-CT and MSCT, respectively. This suggests that bone density measurements could be used to estimate bone microstructural parameters. A strong correlation also was found between CBCT gray values and BV/TV and their gold standards, suggesting the potential of this modality in bone quality assessment at implant site.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone density; bone volume fraction; cone beam computed tomography; dental implants; micro-computed tomography; multislice computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24325572     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  48 in total

Review 1.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  S Panmekiate; N Ngonphloy; T Charoenkarn; T Faruangsaeng; R Pauwels
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jan Wolff; Jan de Lange; Paul F van der Stelt; Frank Lobbezoo; Ghizlane Aarab
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliete N S Guerra; Fabiana T Almeida; Fernanda V Bezerra; Paulo T D S Figueiredo; Maria A G Silva; Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The Effect of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Application on Distracted Bone Quality during Rapid Rate of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Marwa El Kassaby; Khaled Abd El Kader; Nahed Khamis; Alaa Al Hammoud; Alaa Ben Talb; Yasser Nabil El Hadidi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-19

6.  Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.

Authors:  M L Oliveira; D Q Freitas; G M B Ambrosano; F Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

Authors:  R Pauwels; T Faruangsaeng; T Charoenkarn; N Ngonphloy; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

9.  Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Farshid Bastami; Shahriar Shahab; Azin Parsa; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Mohammad Hadi Noori Kooshki; Mahshid Namdari; Hamidreza Azimi Lisar; Tohid Rafiei; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Majid Salehi; Maissa Jafari
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-31

10.  Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values.

Authors:  Amanda P Candemil; Benjamin Salmon; Deborah Q Freitas; Glaucia Mb Ambrosano; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.