Literature DB >> 24325416

Systematic reviews: work that needs to be done and not to be done.

Clive E Adams1, Stefanie Polzmacher, Annabelle Wolff.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews - the next two should see much more.
© 2013 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Keywords:  medical Informatics; systematic reviews; unified medical language system

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24325416     DOI： 10.1111/jebm.12072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Med        ISSN： 1756-5391


  11 in total

1.  History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Core outcome sets and trial registries.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Paula Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Anne Brice; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.

Authors:  Iain J Marshall; Joël Kuiper; Byron C Wallace
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.

Authors:  Allison Gates; Cydney Johnson; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-12

6.  Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farhad Shokraneh; Clive Elliott Adams
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2017-09-17

7.  Systematic review automation technologies.

Authors:  Guy Tsafnat; Paul Glasziou; Miew Keen Choong; Adam Dunn; Filippo Galgani; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-09

8.  Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial.

Authors:  Fiona Alderdice; Jenny McNeill; Toby Lasserson; Elaine Beller; Margaret Carroll; Vanora Hundley; Judith Sunderland; Declan Devane; Jane Noyes; Susan Key; Sarah Norris; Janine Wyn-Davies; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-01

9.  Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.

Authors:  Amy Price; Sara Schroter; Mike Clarke; Helen McAneney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Core outcome sets and systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.