Literature DB >> 24325211

Perspectives on whistleblowing: faculty member viewpoints and suggestions for organizational change.

Jensen T Mecca1, Vincent Giorgini, Kelsey Medeiros, Carter Gibson, Lynn Devenport, Shane Connelly, Michael Mumford.   

Abstract

Given the prevalence of unethical behavior in research, whistleblowing may serve an important policing function. Despite this potential value of whistleblowing to organizations, engaging in this type of activity often has negative ramifications for those who choose to blow the whistle. Organizations may fail to provide adequate support for these individuals. In order to help inform best practices for organizations in terms of whistleblowing support infrastructure, the present effort content analyzed interviews with university faculty members regarding ethical decision making in which whistleblowing was a topic. Relevant themes in these interviews are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24325211     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2014.847735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  3 in total

1.  Main outcomes of an RCT to pilot test reporting and feedback to foster research integrity climates in the VA.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; David C Mohr; Martin P Charns; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; Ann Bangerter; Hanna E Bloomfield; Richard Owen; Carol R Thrush
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-08-07

2.  Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; Ivan Buljan; Emanuele Valenti; Lex Bouter; Ana Marušić; Raymond de Vries; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

3.  How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Vie
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-08-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.