Literature DB >> 24324997

What do general practitioners think and do about prostate cancer screening in Australia?

Dragan Ilic1, Kerry Murphy, Sally Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Men seek advice from their general practitioner (GP) on the merits of screening for prostate cancer. This study aimed to examine how the knowledge and clinical experience of GPs influenced their position on prostate cancer screening.
METHODS: A total of 13 focus groups were set up with 77 GPs. Focus group discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed by two investigators via thematic analysis.
RESULTS: GPs were evenly divided between those who proactively screen men for prostate cancer and those who do so only at the patient's request. GPs had limited knowledge of recently published evidence from trials on prostate cancer screening. DISCUSSION: Effective methods of increasing GP knowledge about evidence-based recommendations and potentially changing clinical behaviour are required in order to promote evidence-based decision-making by GPs and their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24324997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  4 in total

1.  A Genetic Risk Score to Personalize Prostate Cancer Screening, Applied to Population Data.

Authors:  Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Chun Chieh Fan; Roshan Karunamuni; Eleanor I Walsh; Emma L Turner; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin; David E Neal; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; J Kellogg Parsons; Rosalind A Eeles; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch Garcia; Kenneth Muir; Henrik Grönberg; Fredrik Wiklund; Markus Aly; Johanna Schleutker; Csilla Sipeky; Teuvo Lj Tammela; Børge Grønne Nordestgaard; Timothy J Key; Ruth C Travis; Paul D P Pharoah; Nora Pashayan; Kay-Tee Khaw; Stephen N Thibodeau; Shannon K McDonnell; Daniel J Schaid; Christiane Maier; Walther Vogel; Manuel Luedeke; Kathleen Herkommer; Adam S Kibel; Cezary Cybulski; Dominika Wokolorczyk; Wojciech Kluzniak; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Hermann Brenner; Ben Schöttker; Bernd Holleczek; Jong Y Park; Thomas A Sellers; Hui-Yi Lin; Chavdar Kroumov Slavov; Radka P Kaneva; Vanio I Mitev; Jyotsna Batra; Judith A Clements; Amanda B Spurdle; Manuel R Teixeira; Paula Paulo; Sofia Maia; Hardev Pandha; Agnieszka Michael; Ian G Mills; Ole A Andreassen; Anders M Dale; Tyler M Seibert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Doctors' approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kristen Pickles; Stacy M Carter; Lucie Rychetnik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A continuous fall of PSA use for prostate cancer screening among Brazilian doctors since 2001. Good or bad notice?

Authors:  Fernando Antônio Glasner da Rocha Araújo; Nairo Massakazu Sumita; Ubirajara de Oliveira Barroso
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Knowledge and practice of prostate cancer screening among general practitioners in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abdul Malik Tun Firzara; Chirk Jenn Ng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.