Literature DB >> 24324985

Is the problem that everything is a diagnosis?

Jenny Doust1, Paul Glasziou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of 'illnesses' that would never have caused patients harm but potentially exposes them to treat-ments where the risks outweigh the benefits. The problem of overdiagnosis is affecting an increasing proportion of the population.
OBJECTIVE: Overdiagnosis is occurring in several different ways: by changes in the definition or threshold of disease, labelling of risk factors as diseases, early detection from both deliberate screening programs and incidental detection ('incidentalomas'), and the medicalisation of life, particularly in psychiatry. DISCUSSION: General practitioners often carry the burden of care for patients who have been overdiagnosed. It is important that general practi-tioners are aware of the potential harm of overdiagnosis, particularly through early detection and aggressive management of early disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24324985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  5 in total

1.  Re: Hofmann et al. Overdiagnosis, one concept, three perspectives, and a model.

Authors:  Emma Grundtvig Gram; John Brodersen; Christoffer Bjerre Haase; Frederik Martiny; Olsi Kusta; Christina Sadolin Damhus
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis in primary care: framing the problem and finding solutions.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-08-14

3.  How to conduct research on overdiagnosis. A keynote paper from the EGPRN May 2016, Tel Aviv.

Authors:  John Brodersen
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 4.  Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review.

Authors:  Kevin Jenniskens; Joris A H de Groot; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons; Lotty Hooft; Christiana A Naaktgeboren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Consequences of health condition labelling: protocol for a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca Sims; Luise Kazda; Zoe A Michaleff; Paul Glasziou; Rae Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.