| Literature DB >> 24324785 |
Fuqiang Zhao1, Jian Yang, Hong S He, Limin Dai.
Abstract
Improper forest harvesting can potentially degrade forest ecosystem functions and services. Human-assisted regeneration (e.g., planting) is often used to increase the rate of forest recovery and thereby reduce regeneration failure. Seed dispersal is a fundamental ecological process that can also influence spatio-temporal patterns of forest regeneration. In this study, we investigated the relative contribution of planting and seed dispersal on forest regeneration at landscape scales. Because such influences can be further complicated by timber harvest intensity and seed availability within and around harvested area, we also evaluated the effects of those factors on forest landscape dynamics. We used the forest landscape model LANDIS to simulate the dynamics of Korean pine-broadleaf mixed forests in Northeast China. We considered three factors: timber harvest intensity (3 levels), seed dispersal and whether or not planting was used. The results showed that planting was more important in maintaining the abundance of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis), a climax keystone species in this region, under the high-intensity harvesting option during early succession. In contrast, seed dispersal was more important during late succession. Korean pine can be successfully regenerated through seed dispersal under low and medium harvest intensities. Our results also indicated that effective natural regeneration will require protecting seed-production trees (seed rain). This study results provide a basis for more effectively managing Chinese temperate forests and possibly other similar ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24324785 PMCID: PMC3855753 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Lushui River Forestry Bureau in northeast China and the initial age-distribution of Korean pine.
Vital attributes of the major tree species on the forest landscape administered by the Lushui River Forestry Bureau, China.
| Species | LONG | MTR | ST | FT | ED | MD | VP | MVP | HA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 300 | 40 | 4 | 4 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 120 |
|
| 300 | 30 | 4 | 4 | 50 | 150 | 0 | 0 | 120 |
|
| 300 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 0.1 | 60 | 80 |
|
| 200 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 100 | 200 | 0.3 | 60 | 80 |
|
| 150 | 30 | 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 40 |
|
| 150 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 4000 | 0.8 | 50 | 60 |
|
| 250 | 30 | 3 | 3 | 300 | 1000 | 0.7 | 60 | 60 |
|
| 250 | 30 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 100 | 0.9 | 60 | 80 |
|
| 300 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 50 | 150 | 0.1 | 80 | 80 |
|
| 300 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 100 | 0.5 | 60 | 80 |
LONG: life span (years); ED: effective seeding distance (m)
MTR: age of maturity (years); MD: maximum seeding distance (m)
ST: shade tolerance (categorical classes 1 to 5, as class 5 indicates most tolerant)
FT: fire tolerance (categorical classes 1 to 5, as class 5 indicates most tolerant)
VP: vegetative reproduction probability (0–1)MVP: minimum age of vegetative reproduction (years)HA: harvest age
Figure 2Abundance (i.e., percent coverage) of Korean pine seedlings in relation to independent variables.
Figure 3Abundance (i.e., percent coverage) of Korean pine in relation to independent variables.
Figure 4Abundance (i.e., percent coverage) of Korean pine based on type III sums of square values (fixed model) that were explained by independent variables.
Figure 6Abundance (i.e., percent coverage) of broadleaf species in relation to independent variables.