Literature DB >> 24323297

Does standard deviation matter? Using "standard deviation" to quantify security of multistage testing.

Chun Wang1, Yi Zheng, Hua-Hua Chang.   

Abstract

With the advent of web-based technology, online testing is becoming a mainstream mode in large-scale educational assessments. Most online tests are administered continuously in a testing window, which may post test security problems because examinees who take the test earlier may share information with those who take the test later. Researchers have proposed various statistical indices to assess the test security, and one most often used index is the average test-overlap rate, which was further generalized to the item pooling index (Chang & Zhang, 2002, 2003). These indices, however, are all defined as the means (that is, the expected proportion of common items among examinees) and they were originally proposed for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Recently, multistage testing (MST) has become a popular alternative to CAT. The unique features of MST make it important to report not only the mean, but also the standard deviation (SD) of test overlap rate, as we advocate in this paper. The standard deviation of test overlap rate adds important information to the test security profile, because for the same mean, a large SD reflects that certain groups of examinees share more common items than other groups. In this study, we analytically derived the lower bounds of the SD under MST, with the results under CAT as a benchmark. It is shown that when the mean overlap rate is the same between MST and CAT, the SD of test overlap tends to be larger in MST. A simulation study was conducted to provide empirical evidence. We also compared the security of MST under the single-pool versus the multiple-pool designs; both analytical and simulation studies show that the non-overlapping multiple-pool design will slightly increase the security risk.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323297     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9356-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  3 in total

1.  Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.

Authors:  Jinming Zhang; Hua-Hua Chang; Qing Yi
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-09

2.  The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Juan Ramón Barrada; Julio Olea; Francisco José Abad
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.264

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Edison M Choe; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  On-the-Fly Assembled Multistage Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-09-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.