Literature DB >> 24322636

Greater occipital nerve excision for occipital neuralgia refractory to nerve decompression.

Ivica Ducic1, John M Felder, Neelam Khan, Sojin Youn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo occipital nerve decompression for treatment of migraine headaches due to occipital neuralgia have already exhausted medical options for treatment. When surgical decompression fails, it is unknown how best to help these patients. We examine our experience performing greater occipital nerve (GON) excision for pain relief in this select, refractory group of patients.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review supplemented by a follow-up survey was performed on all patients under the care of the senior author who had undergone GON excision after failing occipital nerve decompression. Headache severity was measured by the migraine headache index (MHI) and disability by the migraine disability assessment. Success rate was considered the percentage of patients who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in MHI at final follow-up.
RESULTS: Seventy-one of 108 patients responded to the follow-up survey and were included in the study. Average follow-up was 33 months. The success rate of surgery was 70.4%; 41% of patients showed a 90% or greater decrease in MHI. The MHI changed, on average, from 146 to 49, for an average reduction of 63% (P < 0.001). Migraine disability assessment scores decreased by an average of 49% (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a diagnosis of cervicogenic headache was associated with failure of surgery. The most common adverse effect was bothersome numbness or hypersensitivity in the denervated area, occurring in up to 31% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Excision of the GON is a valid option for pain relief in patients with occipital headaches refractory to both medical treatment and surgical decompression. Potential risks include failure in patients with cervicogenic headache and hypersensitivity of the denervated area. To provide the best outcome to these patients who have failed all previous medical and surgical treatments, a multidisciplinary team approach remains critical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24322636     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182898736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  Improvement in clinical outcomes after dry needling in a patient with occipital neuralgia.

Authors:  Bryan M Bond; Christopher Kinslow
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

2.  Chronic Nerve Injuries and Delays in Surgical Treatment Negatively Impact Patient-reported Quality of Life.

Authors:  John M Felder; Ivica Ducic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 3.  Evaluating the Evidence: Is Neurolysis or Neurectomy a Better Treatment for Occipital Neuralgia?

Authors:  Sarah McNutt; David R Hallan; Elias Rizk
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  RPNI, TMR, and Reset Neurectomy/Relocation Nerve Grafting after Nerve Transection in Headache Surgery.

Authors:  Lisa Gfrerer; Frankie K Wong; Kelli Hickle; Kyle R Eberlin; Ian L Valerio; William G Austen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 5.  Surgical intervention for chronic migraine headache: A systematic review.

Authors:  J C R Wormald; J Luck; B Athwal; T Muelhberger; A Mosahebi
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 6.  A Review of the Recent Findings in Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for the Management of Occipital Neuralgia.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Ruben H Schwartz; Parth Patel; Justin Zeien; Denton Connor; Jamal Hasoon; Amnon A Berger; Hisham Kassem; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2020-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.