Literature DB >> 24322194

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection. From enucleation to pancreatoduodenectomy. 11-year experience.

Marcel Autran Cesar Machado1, Rodrigo Cañada Trofo Surjan, Suzan Menasce Goldman, José Celso Ardengh, Fábio Ferrari Makdissi.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Our experience with laparoscopic pancreatic resection began in 2001. During initial experience, laparoscopy was reserved for selected cases. With increasing experience more complex laparoscopic procedures such as central pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomies were performed.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to review our personal experience with laparoscopic pancreatic resection over 11-year period.
METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreatic resection from 2001 through 2012 were reviewed. Preoperative data included age, gender, and indication for surgery. Intraoperative variables included operative time, bleeding, blood transfusion. Diagnosis, tumor size, margin status were determined from final pathology reports.
RESULTS: Since 2001, 96 patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Median age was 55 years old. 60 patients were female and 36 male. Of these, 88 (91.6%) were performed totally laparoscopic; 4 (4.2%) needed hand-assistance, 1 robotic assistance. Three patients were converted. Four patients needed blood transfusion. Operative time varied according type of operation. Mortality was nil but morbidity was high, mainly due to pancreatic fistula (28.1%). Sixty-one patients underwent distal pancreatectomy, 18 underwent pancreatic enucleation, 7 pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies, 5 uncinate process resection, 3 central and 2 total pancreatectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas is a reality. Pancreas sparing techniques, such as enucleation, resection of uncinate process and central pancreatectomy, should be used to avoid exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency that could be detrimental to the patient's quality of life. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is a safe operation but should be performed in specialized centers by highly skilled laparoscopic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322194     DOI: 10.1590/S0004-28032013000200038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0004-2803


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Qi-Yu Liu; Wen-Zhi Zhang; Hong-Tian Xia; Jian-Jun Leng; Tao Wan; Bin Liang; Tao Yang; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Complications of minimally invasive pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors].

Authors:  U A Wittel; U T Hopt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Robot-Assisted Middle Pancreatectomy for Elderly Patients: Our Initial Experience.

Authors:  Tian Zhang; Xinjing Wang; Zhen Huo; Chenlei Wen; Zhichong Wu; Jiabin Jin; Dongfeng Cheng; Hao Chen; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen; Chenghong Peng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-23

Review 4.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH SPLEEN PRESERVATION.

Authors:  Sergio Renato Pais-Costa; Guilherme Costa Crispim de Sousa; Sergio Luiz Melo Araujo; Olímpia Alves Teixeira Lima
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-08-16

6.  LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT SPLEEN PRESERVATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Sergio Renato Pais-Costa; Guilherme Costa Crispim de Sousa; Sergio Luiz Melo Araujo; Olímpia Alves Teixeira Lima; Sandro José Martins; Orlando J Torres
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2019-12-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.