Literature DB >> 24322122

Effect of correction of aberration dynamics on chaos in human ocular accommodation.

Karen M Hampson, Matthew P Cufflin, Edward A H Mallen.   

Abstract

We used adaptive optics to determine the effect of monochromatic aberration dynamics on the level of chaos in the accommodation control system. Four participants viewed a stationary target while the dynamics of their aberrations were either left uncorrected, defocus was corrected, or all aberrations except defocus were corrected. Chaos theory analysis was used to discern changes in the accommodative microfluctuations. We found a statistically significant reduction in the chaotic nature of the accommodation microfluctuations during correction of defocus, but not when all aberrations except defocus were corrected. The Lyapunov exponent decreased from 0.71 ± 0.07 D/s (baseline) to 0.55 ± 0.03 D/s (correction of defocus fluctuations). As the reduction of chaos in physiological signals is indicative of stress to the system, the results indicate that for the participants included in this study, fluctuations in defocus have a more profound effect than those of the other aberrations. There were no changes in the power spectrum between experimental conditions. Hence chaos theory analysis is a more subtle marker of changes in the accommodation control system and will be of value in the study of myopia onset and progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322122     DOI: 10.1364/OL.38.004747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Lett        ISSN: 0146-9592            Impact factor:   3.776


  4 in total

1.  Wavefront aberration changes caused by a gradient of increasing accommodation stimuli.

Authors:  X-Y Zhou; L Wang; X-T Zhou; Z-Q Yu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 3.  Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; John S Werner; Stephen A Burns; William H Merigan; Pablo Artal; David A Atchison; Karen M Hampson; Richard Legras; Linda Lundstrom; Geungyoung Yoon; Joseph Carroll; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Adam M Dubis; Alfredo Dubra; Ann Elsner; Ravi Jonnal; Donald T Miller; Michel Paques; Hannah E Smithson; Laura K Young; Yuhua Zhang; Melanie Campbell; Jennifer Hunter; Andrew Metha; Grazyna Palczewska; Jesse Schallek; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Sensitivity of Chaos Measures in Detecting Stress in the Focusing Control Mechanism of the Short-Sighted Eye.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Matthew P Cufflin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.758

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.