Literature DB >> 24321884

Biosensing enhancement using passive mixing structures for microarray-based sensors.

N Scott Lynn1, José-Israel Martínez-López2, Markéta Bocková1, Pavel Adam1, Victor Coello3, Héctor R Siller4, Jiří Homola5.   

Abstract

The combination of microarray technologies with microfluidic sample delivery and real-time detection methods has the capability to simultaneously monitor 10-1000 s of biomolecular interactions in a single experiment. Despite the benefits that microfluidic systems provide, they typically operate in the laminar flow regime under mass transfer limitations, where large analyte depletion layers act as a resistance to analyte capture. By locally stirring the fluid and delivering fresh analyte to the capture spot, the use of passive mixing structures in a microarray environment can reduce the negative effects of these depletion layers and enhance the sensor performance. Despite their large potential, little attention has been given to the integration of these mixing structures in microarray sensing environments. In this study, we use passive mixing structures to enhance the mass transfer of analyte to a capture spot within a microfluidic flow cell. Using numerical methods, different structure shapes and heights were evaluated as means to increase local fluid velocities, and in turn, rates of mass transfer to a capture spot. These results were verified experimentally via the real-time detection of 20-mer ssDNA for an array of microspots. Both numerical and experimental results showed that a passive mixing structure situated directly over the capture spot can significantly enhance the binding rate of analyte to the sensing surface. Moreover, we show that these structures can be used to enhance mass transfer in experiments regarding an array of capture spots. The results of this study can be applied to any experimental system using microfluidic sample delivery methods for microarray detection techniques.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biosensors; Mass transfer; Microarrays; Microfluidic mixing; Microfluidics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321884     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  10 in total

1.  Microarray-integrated optoelectrofluidic immunoassay system.

Authors:  Dongsik Han; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods.

Authors:  Kevin Ward; Z Hugh Fan
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.881

3.  Microfluidic Mixing and Analog On-Chip Concentration Control Using Fluidic Dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Nicholas Mavrogiannis; Mitchell Desmond; Kenny Ling; Xiaotong Fu; Zachary Gagnon
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Characterization of Total-Phosphorus (TP) Pretreatment Microfluidic Chip Based on a Thermally Enhanced Photocatalyst for Portable Analysis of Eutrophication.

Authors:  Dong Geon Jung; Daewoong Jung; Seong Ho Kong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Review of Microfluidic Water Quality Monitoring Sensors.

Authors:  Swapna A Jaywant; Khalid Mahmood Arif
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Numerical Study of Multivortex Regulation in Curved Microchannels with Ultra-Low-Aspect-Ratio.

Authors:  Shaofei Shen; Mengqi Gao; Fangjuan Zhang; Yanbing Niu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Enhancement of Binding Kinetics on Affinity Substrates Using Asymmetric Electroosmotic Flow on a Sinusoidal Bipolar Electrode.

Authors:  Yupan Wu; Bowen Hu; Xun Ma; Yucheng Wang; Wei Li; Shaoxi Wang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Characterization of Mixing Performance Induced by Double Curved Passive Mixing Structures in Microfluidic Channels.

Authors:  Ingrid H Oevreeide; Andreas Zoellner; Bjørn T Stokke
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Xurography as a Rapid Fabrication Alternative for Point-of-Care Devices: Assessment of Passive Micromixers.

Authors:  J Israel Martínez-López; Mauricio Mojica; Ciro A Rodríguez; Héctor R Siller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  AC Electroosmosis Effect on Microfluidic Heterogeneous Immunoassay Efficiency.

Authors:  Marwa Selmi; Hafedh Belmabrouk
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.