Literature DB >> 24321785

Quantification of esophageal tumor motion on cine-magnetic resonance imaging.

Frederiek M Lever1, Irene M Lips1, Sjoerd P M Crijns1, Onne Reerink1, Astrid L H M W van Lier1, Marinus A Moerland1, Marco van Vulpen1, Gert J Meijer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the movement of esophageal tumors noninvasively on cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by use of a semiautomatic method to visualize tumor movement directly throughout multiple breathing cycles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-six patients with esophageal tumors underwent MRI. Tumors were located in the upper (8), middle (7), and lower (21) esophagus. Cine-MR images were collected in the coronal and sagittal plane during 60 seconds at a rate of 2 Hz. An adaptive correlation filter was used to automatically track a previously marked reference point. Tumor movement was measured in the craniocaudal (CC), left-right (LR), and anteroposterior (AP) directions and its relationship along the longitudinal axis of the esophagus was investigated.
RESULTS: Tumor registration within the individual images was typically done at a millisecond time scale. The mean (SD) peak-to-peak displacements in the CC, AP, and LR directions were 13.3 (5.2) mm, 4.9 (2.5) mm, and 2.7 (1.2) mm, respectively. The bandwidth to cover 95% of excursions from the mean position (c95) was also calculated to exclude outliers caused by sporadic movements. The mean (SD) c95 values were 10.1 (3.8) mm, 3.7 (1.9) mm, and 2.0 (0.9) mm in the CC, AP, and LR dimensions. The end-exhale phase provided a stable position in the respiratory cycle, compared with more variety in the end-inhale phase. Furthermore, lower tumors showed more movement than did higher tumors in the CC and AP directions.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrafraction tumor movement was highly variable between patients. Tumor position proved the most stable during the respiratory cycle in the end-exhale phase. A better understanding of tumor motion makes it possible to individualize radiation delivery strategies accordingly. Cine-MRI is a successful noninvasive modality to analyze motion for this purpose in the future.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321785     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

Review 1.  Motion management in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Hassan Abbas; Bryan Chang; Zhe Jay Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Are fiducial markers useful surrogates when using respiratory gating to reduce motion of gastroesophageal junction tumors?

Authors:  Fenghong Liu; Shu Ng; Florence Huguet; Ellen D Yorke; Gikas S Mageras; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Patient perspectives on repeated MRI and PET/CT examinations during neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lucas Goense; Alicia S Borggreve; Sophie E Heethuis; Astrid Lhmw van Lier; Richard van Hillegersberg; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Clinical response assessment on DW-MRI compared with FDG-PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sophie E Vollenbrock; Francine E M Voncken; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Maarten L Donswijk; Erik Vegt; Leon C Ter Beek; Jolanda M van Dieren; Johanna W van Sandick; Berthe M P Aleman; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  The peri-esophageal connective tissue layers and related compartments: visualization by histology and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T J Weijs; L Goense; P S N van Rossum; G J Meijer; A L H M W van Lier; F J Wessels; M N G Braat; I M Lips; J P Ruurda; M A Cuesta; R van Hillegersberg; R L A W Bleys
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Added value of MRI to endoscopic and endosonographic response assessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sophie E Vollenbrock; Jolanda M van Dieren; Francine E M Voncken; Sietze T van Turenhout; Liudmila L Kodach; Koen J Hartemink; Johanna W van Sandick; Berthe M P Aleman; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging With 3-Dimensional Radial Sampling and Self-Gating-Based K-Space Sorting: Early Clinical Experience on Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Wensha Yang; Zhaoyang Fan; Richard Tuli; Zixin Deng; Jianing Pang; Ashley Wachsman; Robert Reznik; Howard Sandler; Debiao Li; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The effect of dose escalation on gastric toxicity when treating lower oesophageal tumours: a radiobiological investigation.

Authors:  Rhys Carrington; John Staffurth; Samantha Warren; Mike Partridge; Chris Hurt; Emiliano Spezi; Sarah Gwynne; Maria A Hawkins; Thomas Crosby
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; Arpita Agarwal; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Radiobiological determination of dose escalation and normal tissue toxicity in definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Samantha Warren; Mike Partridge; Rhys Carrington; Chris Hurt; Thomas Crosby; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.