| Literature DB >> 24321563 |
Hayley Dickinson1, Karen M Moritz, Michelle M Kett.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a significant body of evidence to suggest that hormone levels, receptor density and structural differences between males and females can significantly alter renal hemodynamics. We compared the renal hemodynamic and excretory profile of female and male spiny mice under baseline conditions and in response to a high-NaCl diet.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24321563 PMCID: PMC4029144 DOI: 10.1186/2042-6410-4-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sex Differ ISSN: 2042-6410 Impact factor: 5.027
24 hour renal function in male and female spiny mice
| 36.6 ± 0.7 | 32.0 ± 0.6* | |
| 101.8 ± 6.3 | 112.2 ±14.4 | |
| 37.2 ±3.1 | 35.3 ± 6.5 | |
| 86.6 ± 4.1 | 79.9 ±7.1 | |
| 2.52 ± 0.26 | 2.46 ± 0.40 | |
| 53.2 ± 3.2 | 45.4 ± 7.1 | |
| 2546 ± 419 | 2247 ±286 | |
| 90.4 ± 13.2 | 70.6 ± 11.6 | |
| 16 | 15 |
Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.001.
Figure 1Conscious renal function - 24 h conscious renal function in male (open bars) and female (hatched bars) spiny mice before (baseline) and after 7 days of high salt diet. n = 5/sex/diet, P-values by Two-way Repeated ANOVA with sex and diet as the fixed factors.
Anaesthetised renal function and PCR analysis of male and female spiny mice on normal or high salt diets
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 35.8 ± 0.4 | 35.7 ± 0.9 | 33.5 ± 1.0 | 31.8 ± 0.7 | 0.29 | 0.35 | |
| | 36.8 ± 0.6 | 37.1 ± 0.6 | 33.9 ± 0.8 | 32.0 ± 0.9 | 0.29 | 0.16 | |
| | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.3 | 0.052 | 0.84 | 0.46 |
| | 268 ± 11 | 295 ± 10 | 263 ± 9 | 285 ± 8 | 0.42 | 0.80 | |
| | 7.27 ± 0.23 | 7.97 ± 0.18 | 7.75 ± 0.16 | 8.95 ± 0.33 | 0.29 | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | 62.0 ± 1.5 | 67.4 ± 1.7 | 60.3 ± 2.0 | 62.4 ± 1.6 | 0.07 | 0.36 | |
| | 3.66 ± 0.12 | 6.63 ± 0.34 | 3.43 ± 0.28 | 4.83 ± 0.51 | |||
| | 11.60 ± 0.54 | 18.36 ± 1.38 | 11.51 ± 1.80 | 17.61 ± 1.38 | 0.76 | 0.81 | |
| | 3.03 ± 0.10 | 2.12 ± 0.17 | 3.35 ± 0.48 | 2.09 ± 0.15 | 0.62 | 0.55 | |
| | 32 ± 2 | 37 ± 3 | 32 ± 3 | 27 ± 1 | 0.07 | 0.95 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| AQP3 | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 0.72 ± 0.14 | 0.75 ± 0.14 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 0.28 |
| V2R | 1.00 ± 0.15 | 0.79 ± 0.20 | 0.67 ± 0.12 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.28 |
Values are means ± SEM. n = 6 per sex on normal salt diet, n = 5 per sex on high salt diet. NS, non significant, g; gram, BM, body mass, KM, kidney mass, MAP, mean arterial pressure, GFR, glomerular filtration rate, ERPF, effective renal plasma flow, RVR, renal vascular resistance. Data were analysed by Two way ANOVA.