Literature DB >> 24321562

Psychometric properties of the DCD-Q-07 in children ages to 4-6.

Arpita Parmar1, Matthew Kwan2, Christine Rodriguez3, Cheryl Missiuna4, John Cairney5.   

Abstract

It is important to identify Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) early in a child's life to allow for proper and timely intervention and support, and to reduce the negative secondary consequences associated with this condition. In this study we assessed the psychometric properties (construct validity, concurrent validity, reliability and test accuracy) of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q-07) in preschool children. A community-based sample of children ages 4-6 (n=181) were screened for motor difficulties using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC-2). Use of the M-ABC-2 resulted in the identification of 29 children below the 15th percentile, which we classified as probable DCD. Parents of these children concurrently completed the DCD-Q-07 to report their child's motor performance. The DCD-Q-07 demonstrated high internal consistency for both the full scale (alpha=0.881) and each subscale: control during movement (alpha=0.813), fine motor and handwriting (alpha=0.869) and general coordination (alpha=0.728). Moderate correlations (r=0.47-0.63) were also seen between the subscales on the DCD-Q-07, the strongest correlation being between control during movement and general coordination (r=0.63). Based on published age and sex cut points, the DCD-Q-07 showed poor sensitivity (20.7%) but high specificity (92.1%) against the M-ABC-2. Overall agreement with the M-ABC-2 was low using ROC analysis (area under the curve=0.654). Although it is important to screen for DCD in young children, the DCD-Q-07 may not be the best choice as a screening tool for DCD in preschool children ages 4-6 due to its low test accuracy.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCD-Q-07; Developmental Coordination Disorder; M-ABC-2; Reliability; Screening; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321562     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  3 in total

1.  The Coordination and Activity Tracking in CHildren (CATCH) study: rationale and design.

Authors:  John Cairney; Cheryl Missiuna; Brian W Timmons; Christine Rodriguez; Scott Veldhuizen; Sara King-Dowling; Sarah Wellman; Tuyen Le
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Do Girls with Excess Adiposity Perform Poorer Motor Skills than Leaner Peers?

Authors:  Daniel DAS Virgens Chagas; Joyce Ferreira Carvalho; Luiz Alberto Batista
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2016-07-01

3.  Criterion Validity and Applicability of Motor Screening Instruments in Children Aged 5-6 Years: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nienke H van Dokkum; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Judith Th B W de Best; Marleen Hamoen; Sanne C M Te Wierike; Arend F Bos; Marlou L A de Kroon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.