Literature DB >> 24321423

Stereoacuity norms for school-age children using the Frisby stereotest.

Pamela M Anketell1, Kathryn J Saunders, Julie-Anne Little.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Frisby stereotest and the TNO test for stereoscopic vision are popular clinical tests for assessing stereoacuity: however, reference data for school-age children for the Frisby stereotest are limited. This study compared stereoacuity results of both tests in a large sample of typically developing school-age children.
METHODS: Primary (elementary school grades 1-6) and post-primary (high school grades 7-11) students aged 6-16 years were recruited and assessed in schools. Stereoacuity thresholds were measured using the Frisby and TNO stereotests. Children with ocular pathology, anisometropia of ≥1.00 D, interocular difference of visual acuity ≥0.2 logMAR, or strabismus were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 212 children were recruited; data for 186 subjects were analyzed. Median Frisby stereoacuity scores were, for crossed disparity, 20 arcsec for primary and 10 arcsec for post-primary children and, for uncrossed disparity, 25 arcsec (primary) and 10 arcsec (post-primary). TNO stereoacuity was 60 arcsec for both age groups. For Frisby stereoacuity, scores of 85 arcsec (crossed) and 170 arcsec (uncrossed) or better were achieved by 95% of primary school children; scores of 85 arcsec (crossed and uncrossed) or better were achieved by 95% of post-primary subjects. A statistically significant difference in median stereoacuity scores was noted across age groups for the Frisby stereotest (crossed: z = 4.67, P < 0.0001; uncrossed: z = 4.67, P < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference in stereoacuity scores was noted with the TNO stereotest (z = 1.35, P = 0.18). A significant weak correlation was found between the Frisby and TNO stereotests (Frisby [crossed], r = 0.21 P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: These data describe normative values for the Frisby stereotest for children aged 6-16 years. Participants recorded significantly better stereoacuity scores with the Frisby stereotest than the TNO stereotest. The Frisby stereotest values are weakly correlated with the TNO stereoacuity test.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321423     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  11 in total

1.  Stereopsis results at 4.5 years of age in the infant aphakia treatment study.

Authors:  E Eugenie Hartmann; Ann U Stout; Michael J Lynn; Kimberly G Yen; Stacey J Kruger; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Stereoacuity and its determinants in 7-year-old children: the Lhasa Childhood Eye Study.

Authors:  Yunyun Sun; Jing Fu; Lei Li; Weiwei Chen; Zhaojun Meng; Han Su; Yao Yao; Wei Dai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effect of chromatic contrast on stereoacuity measurement with computer-aided three-dimensional technology.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Huang Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-05

4.  Normative Values, Testability, and Validity for a New Preferential Looking Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Sarah E Morale; Reed M Jost; Jeffrey S Hunter; David R Weakley; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil       Date:  2021-02-08

5.  Percentile curves of stereacuity in a Spanish paediatric population.

Authors:  Borja Navas-Navia; Laura Garcia-Montero; Belén Pérez-Sanchez; Clara Martínez-Pérez; César Villa-Collar
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Distance stereotesting using vision test charts for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Noriko Nishikawa; Satoshi Ishiko; Ikuko Yamaga; Miho Sato; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-25

8.  Evaluating stereoacuity with 3D shutter glasses technology.

Authors:  Huang Wu; Han Jin; Ying Sun; Yang Wang; Min Ge; Yang Chen; Yunfeng Chi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 9.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Screening for Stereopsis of Children Using an Autostereoscopic Smartphone.

Authors:  Yanhui Yang; Huang Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.