Literature DB >> 24321322

Lower incidence of unexpected in-hospital death after interprofessional implementation of a bedside track-and-trigger system.

Gitte Bunkenborg1, Karin Samuelson2, Ingrid Poulsen3, Steen Ladelund4, Jonas Åkeson5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-hospital patients may suffer unexpected death because of suboptimal monitoring. Early recognition of deviating physiological parameters may enable staff to prevent unexpected in-hospital death. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term effects of systematic interprofessional use of early warning scoring, structured observation charts, and clinical algorithms for bedside action.
METHODS: A prospective non-randomized controlled study of unexpected in-hospital death before and after implementation of a clinical intervention in a medical and surgical ward setting at an urban Danish university hospital. Information was obtained over three four-month study periods - a pre-interventional one in 2009 (1st March-30th June), and two postinterventional ones in 2010 (1st September-31st December) and 2011 (1st March-30th June). The incidence of unexpected patient death, the primary study outcome, was calculated as the rate of unexpected patient mortality based on in-hospital risk time. RESULT: The adjusted unexpected patient mortality rate was significantly lower during the second postinterventional study period than before the intervention, 17 versus 61 per 100 adjusted patient years (P=0.013), corresponding to a rate ratio of 0.271 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.097-0.762). A tendency to reduced unexpected mortality was found during the first postinterventional study period (25 versus 61 per 100 adjusted patient years, P=0.053; rate ratio 0.404, CI 0.161-1.012).
CONCLUSION: Clinical intervention comprising systematic monitoring practice, early warning scoring, an observation chart, and an algorithm for bedside management, implemented by interprofessional teaching, training, and optimization of communication and collaboration, may significantly reduce unexpected in-hospital mortality.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Algorithm; Interprofessional; Mortality rate; Observation chart; Severity scoring; Track-and-trigger system

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321322     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of two Early Warning Score systems to Identify Patient Deterioration-A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Caroline S Langkjaer; Dorthe G Bove; Pernille B Nielsen; Kasper K Iversen; Morten H Bestle; Gitte Bunkenborg
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-27

2.  Culture and personal influences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation- results of international survey.

Authors:  Janet Ozer; Gadi Alon; Dmitry Leykin; Joseph Varon; Limor Aharonson-Daniel; Sharon Einav
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Predictive Models of Fever, ICU Transfer, and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Neutropenia.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gulleen; Mawulolo K Ameko; John E Ainsworth; Laura E Barnes; Christopher C Moore
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-12-02

4.  Effect of National Early Warning Scoring System Implementation on Cardiopulmonary Arrest, Unplanned ICU Admission, Emergency Surgery, and Acute Kidney Injury in an Emergency Hospital, Egypt.

Authors:  Mohamed Naeem Badr; Nahla Shaaban Khalil; Ahmed Mohamed Mukhtar
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-15

5.  Combining National Early Warning Score With Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Improves Risk Prediction in Acute Medical Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Line J H Rasmussen; Steen Ladelund; Thomas H Haupt; Gertrude E Ellekilde; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Ove Andersen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.598

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.