Literature DB >> 24321082

Procedural justice and the judge-probationer relationship in a co-occurring disorders court.

Myesa Knox Mahoney1.   

Abstract

Although a considerable amount of research has been conducted on treatment-based courts, there is little quantitative evidence that describes the relationship between the judge and the probationer. The present study examines perceptions of the judge-probationer relationship (JPR), procedural justice, and outcome satisfaction within a co-occurring disorders court (CODC) in Orange County, California. Based on interview and survey data from a sample of probationers within the CODC (n=24), this article argues that perceptions of procedural justice are linked to perceptions of relationship quality between the judge and probationer. Analysis of the data found that probationers in the CODC have very positive views of their relationships with the judge, and elements of relationship quality are significantly linked with perceptions of procedural justice. Procedural justice is also a predictor of satisfaction with outcome in this sample. The results show promise that procedural justice and the quality of the judge-probationer relationship can positively affect probationers with co-occurring disorders in specialty courts.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Co-occurring disorders; Dual diagnosis; Judge–probationer relationship; Procedural justice

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24321082     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-2527


  1 in total

Review 1.  Preventing Criminal Recidivism Through Mental Health and Criminal Justice Collaboration.

Authors:  J Steven Lamberti
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.