BACKGROUND: Nulliparity is associated with lower birthweight, but few studies have examined how within-mother changes in risk factors impact this association. METHODS: We used longitudinal electronic medical record data from a hospital-based cohort of consecutive singleton live births from 2002-2010 in Utah. To reduce bias from unobserved pregnancies, primary analyses were limited to 9484 women who entered nulliparous from 2002-2004, with 23,380 pregnancies up to parity 3. Unrestricted secondary analyses used 101,225 pregnancies from 45,212 women with pregnancies up to parity 7. We calculated gestational age and sex-specific birthweight z-scores with nulliparas as the reference. Using linear mixed models, we estimated birthweight z-score by parity adjusting for pregnancy-specific sociodemographics, smoking, alcohol, prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and medical conditions. RESULTS: Compared with nulliparas', infants of primiparas were larger by 0.20 unadjusted z-score units [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.22]; the adjusted increase was similar at 0.18 z-score units [95% CI 0.15, 0.20]. Birthweight continued to increase up to parity 3, but with a smaller difference (parity 3 vs. 0 β = 0.27 [95% CI 0.20, 0.34]). In the unrestricted secondary sample, there was significant departure in linearity from parity 1 to 7 (P < 0.001); birthweight increased only up to parity 4 (parity 4 vs. 0 β = 0.34 [95% CI 0.31, 0.37]). CONCLUSIONS: The association between parity and birthweight was non-linear with the greatest increase observed between first- and second-born infants of the same mother. Adjustment for changes in weight or chronic diseases did not change the relationship between parity and birthweight. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: Nulliparity is associated with lower birthweight, but few studies have examined how within-mother changes in risk factors impact this association. METHODS: We used longitudinal electronic medical record data from a hospital-based cohort of consecutive singleton live births from 2002-2010 in Utah. To reduce bias from unobserved pregnancies, primary analyses were limited to 9484 women who entered nulliparous from 2002-2004, with 23,380 pregnancies up to parity 3. Unrestricted secondary analyses used 101,225 pregnancies from 45,212 women with pregnancies up to parity 7. We calculated gestational age and sex-specific birthweight z-scores with nulliparas as the reference. Using linear mixed models, we estimated birthweight z-score by parity adjusting for pregnancy-specific sociodemographics, smoking, alcohol, prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and medical conditions. RESULTS: Compared with nulliparas', infants of primiparas were larger by 0.20 unadjusted z-score units [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.22]; the adjusted increase was similar at 0.18 z-score units [95% CI 0.15, 0.20]. Birthweight continued to increase up to parity 3, but with a smaller difference (parity 3 vs. 0 β = 0.27 [95% CI 0.20, 0.34]). In the unrestricted secondary sample, there was significant departure in linearity from parity 1 to 7 (P < 0.001); birthweight increased only up to parity 4 (parity 4 vs. 0 β = 0.34 [95% CI 0.31, 0.37]). CONCLUSIONS: The association between parity and birthweight was non-linear with the greatest increase observed between first- and second-born infants of the same mother. Adjustment for changes in weight or chronic diseases did not change the relationship between parity and birthweight. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez; Cande V Ananth; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Romy Gaillard; Paul S Albert; Michael Schomaker; Patrick McElduff; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Eva C Diaz; Mario A Cleves; Marisha DiCarlo; Sarah R Sobik; Meghan L Ruebel; Keshari M Thakali; Clark R Sims; Nafisa K Dajani; Rebecca A Krukowski; Elisabet Børsheim; Thomas M Badger; Kartik Shankar; Aline Andres Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Melissa E Heard-Lipsmeyer; Eva C Diaz; Clark R Sims; Sarah R Sobik; Meghan L Ruebel; Keshari M Thakali; Rebecca A Krukowski; Mario Cleves; Elisabet Børsheim; Kartik Shankar; Aline Andres Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ashwini Lakshmanan; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Brent A Coull; Allan C Just; Sarah L Maxwell; Joel Schwartz; Alexandros Gryparis; Itai Kloog; Rosalind J Wright; Robert O Wright Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Suprava Patel; Neha R Verma; Phalguni Padhi; Tripty Naik; Rachita Nanda; Gitismita Naik; Eli Mohapatra Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2021-01-30
Authors: William Mueller; Kraichat Tantrakarnapa; Helinor Jane Johnston; Miranda Loh; Susanne Steinle; Sotiris Vardoulakis; John W Cherrie Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Alexa A Freedman; Gregory E Miller; Lauren S Keenan-Devlin; Britney P Smart; Janedelie Romero; Ann Borders; Linda M Ernst Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2021-05-21