Literature DB >> 24320025

Development of the Spanish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity study.

Maria Jose Zarco-Periñan1, María J Barrera-Chacón, Inmaculada García-Obrero, Juan Bosco Mendez-Ferrer, Luis Eduardo Alarcon, Carmen Echevarria-Ruiz de Vargas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III for Spain and to validate the Spanish version of the SCIM III (eSCIM III). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Development of eSCIM III has involved translation, back-translation and assessment of cultural equivalence procedures. eSCIM version III, was administered to 64 patients with spinal cord injury, admitted to our hospital. Investigation of the psychometric characteristics included: (1) study of the inter-rater reliability, (2) internal consistency (Cronbach's α), (3) validation and confirmation of the correlation between eSCIM III and Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and (4) sensitivity to change.
RESULTS: The reliability of eSCIM III showed an intra-class coefficient value >0.97 in the different subscales assessed. Internal consistency of eSCIM III was shown by a Cronbach's α value of 0.93. The validity of eSCIM III was confirmed by the close correlation with FIM (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity to change of eSCIM III was also confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: eSCIM III was found to be culturally equivalent to the original version, as reliability and validity of this tool were demonstrated. It can be used in Spain for functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; Spain; Spanish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III; spinal cord injury; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320025     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.864713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  9 in total

1.  Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III.

Authors:  H Unalan; T O Misirlioglu; B Erhan; M Akyuz; B Gunduz; E Irgi; H E Arslan; A Baltacı; S Aslan; D Palamar; A Kutlu; J Majlesi; U Akarırmak; S S Karamehmetoglu
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  A validity study of the Spanish-World Health Organization Quality of Life short version instrument in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sebastián Salvador-De La Barrera; Rubén Mora-Boga; Mª Elena Ferreiro-Velasco; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Antonio Montoto-Marqués; Antonio Rodríguez-Sotillo; Sonia Pertega Díaz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Reliability and discriminative ability of the spinal cord independence measure III (Thai version).

Authors:  J Wannapakhe; W Saensook; C Keawjoho; S Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Development of Persian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III assessed by interview: a psychometric study.

Authors:  Hooshang Saberi; Farzad Vosoughi; Nazi Derakhshanrad; Mirsaeed Yekaninejad; Zahid Hussain Khan; Amir Hassan Kohan; Shahriar Parvaneh; Setareh Ghahari; Fereydoon Agheli; Fardis Vosoughi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Prognostic validity of a clinical trunk control test for independence and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo; Paola C Fratini-Escobar; Kievka M Almaguer-Benavides; Ana Valeria Aguirre-Güemez; Aída Barrera-Ortíz; Ramiro Pérez-Zavala; Antonio Rafael Villa-Romero
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Lack of knowledge and training are the major obstacles in application of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in China.

Authors:  Nan Liu; Huayi Xing; Mouwang Zhou; Fin Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Do clinical balance measures have the ability to predict falls among ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Libak Abou; Jocemar Ilha; Francielle Romanini; Laura A Rice
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).

Authors:  M Aguilar-Rodríguez; L Peña-Pachés; C Grao-Castellote; F Torralba-Collados; D Hervás-Marín; M Giner-Pascual
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Dry needling technique decreases spasticity and improves general functioning in incomplete spinal cord injury: A case report.

Authors:  Carlos Cruz-Montecinos; Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés; Trinidad Bruna-Melo; Claudio Tapia; Pablo Becerra; Nicolás Pavez; Sofía Pérez-Alenda
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.985

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.