| Literature DB >> 24319477 |
Zhaoyi Huang1, Xiaohu Xu, Fuer Lu, Nan Wang, Guang Chen, Yan Zhao, Xin Zou, Kaifu Wang, Hui Dong, Lijun Xu.
Abstract
Jiao Tai Wan (JTW), a Chinese herbal formula containing Rhizoma Coptidis and Cortex Cinnamomi, has been used for diabetic treatment for many years. The aim of this study was to determine the main components in JTW and to investigate the effects of JTW on hepatic lipid accumulation in diabetic rats and humans. JTW extract was prepared and the main components were assayed by HPLC. An animal model of diabetes mellitus was established and JTW was administered intragastrically. In the clinical study, diabetic patients with poor glycemic control were treated with JTW. Blood glucose and lipid parameters, liver histology, hepatic triglyceride content and lipogenic gene expression were examined. Our data demonstrated that JTW significantly improved hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hepatic lipid accumulation in diabetic rats. This was accompanied by the down-regulation of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC) and fatty acid synthase (FAS) protein expressions, and the up-regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and phosphorylated-ACC (pACC) protein expressions in the liver tissues. Diabetic patients also exhibited decreases in their hepatic triglyceride content. The results suggest that JTW attenuates hepatic lipid accumulation in diabetic rats and humans. These beneficial effects are possibly associated with the inhibition of lipogenic gene expression in the liver.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24319477 PMCID: PMC3844214 DOI: 10.1155/2013/567045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The chromatograms of berberine, cinnamaldehyde, and cinnamic acid in JTW. (a) The chromatogram of berberine in JTW (peak A is berberine), (b) the chromatogram of cinnamaldehyde in JTW (peak B is cinnamaldehyde), and (c) the chromatogram of cinnamic acid in JTW (peak C is cinnamic acid).
The effect of JTW on body weight, OGTT, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR in diabetic rats.
| Group | Body weight | FPG | 1hPPG | 2hPPG | FINS | HOMA-IR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | ( | ||
| Control | 451 ± 28 | 6.20 ± 0.69 | 7.39 ± 0.50 | 7.10 ± 0.44 | 29.71 ± 10.21 | 9.10 ± 1.37 |
| Diabetic | 509 ± 52# | 8.34 ± 0.81## | 13.39 ± 4.80## | 11.63 ± 1.93## | 55.32 ± 19.18## | 17.54 ± 4.37## |
| JTW | 459 ± 40* | 6.13 ± 0.54** | 8.71 ± 0.78** | 8.03 ± 0.82** | 40.38 ± 11.86** | 11.14 ± 1.93** |
| Met | 435 ± 49* | 6.30 ± 0.69** | 8.17 ± 1.45** | 7.76 ± 1.15** | 41.15 ± 11.86** | 11.47 ± 2.83** |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 versus control group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus diabetic group.
The effect of JTW on plasma lipid profiles in diabetic rats.
| Group | TC | TG | LDL-C | HDL-C | NEFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | |
| Control | 3.16 ± 0.18 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1.20 ± 0.18 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.28 |
| Diabetic | 5.66 ± 0.77## | 0.95 ± 0.28## | 3.76 ± 1.12## | 0.83 ± 0.13## | 1.57 ± 0.35## |
| JTW | 4.23 ± 0.34** | 0.45 ± 0.03** | 1.92 ± 0.45* | 1.09 ± 0.21** | 1.15 ± 0.30* |
| Met | 3.88 ± 0.62** | 0.45 ± 0.04** | 1.58 ± 0.70** | 1.07 ± 0.18** | 1.02 ± 0.41** |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. ## P < 0.01 versus control group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus diabetic group.
The effect of JTW on plasma liver enzyme activity and HTC in diabetic rats.
| Group | ALT | AST | HTC |
|---|---|---|---|
| (U/L) | (U/L) | ( | |
| Control | 36.13 ± 0.39 | 18.13 ± 4.36 | 4.16 ± 2.54 |
| Diabetic | 58.62 ± 10.45## | 29.62 ± 3.67## | 12.30 ± 3.30## |
| JTW | 41.43 ± 2.08** | 21.98 ± 3.62** | 8.35 ± 3.20* |
| Met | 42.55 ± 3.17* | 22.07 ± 3.19* | 8.70 ± 3.22* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. ## P < 0.01 versus control group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus diabetic group.
Figure 2The effect of JTW on liver pathology in diabetic rats. Representative H&E stained images in liver sections from the control group (a), diabetic group (b), JTW group (c), and metformin group (d). Original magnification ×400.
Figure 3The effect of JTW on hepatic lipogenic gene expression in diabetic rats. pAMPK and AMPK protein expressions ((a), (c), and (e)), pACC and ACC protein expressions ((b), (d), and (f)), and FAS protein expression ((g), (h)). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 versus control group. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus diabetic group.
General characteristics and laboratory data of diabetic patients at baseline and 12 weeks after the therapy.
| Group | Control | JTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Subjects (M/F) | 9/11 | 9/11 | ||
| Age (years) | 46.1 ± 7.3 | 46.2 ± 6.1 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.9 ± 3.5 | 24.7 ± 3.3 | 25.1 ± 3.6 | 22.9 ± 2.9#∗ |
| WC (cm) (F) | 83.4 ± 5.7 | 83.3 ± 6.5 | 82.9 ± 5.8 | 80.6 ± 4.2#∗ |
| WC (cm) (M) | 90.6 ± 7.0 | 90.5 ± 8.1 | 91.7 ± 6.7 | 89.1 ± 5.6#∗ |
| WHR (F) | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 0.86 ± 0.03#∗ |
| WHR (M) | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.05#∗ |
| SBP (mmHg) | 132 ± 22 | 130 ± 24 | 130 ± 20 | 130 ± 20 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80 ± 12 | 79 ± 10 | 80 ± 10 | 79 ± 12 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 7.64 (6.20, 9.37) | 7.67 (6.41, 9.25) | 7.89 (6.10, 9.22) | 6.78 (4.01, 8.69)#∗ |
| 2hPPG (mmol/L) | 13.16 ± 4.15 | 13.21 ± 4.55 | 13.25 ± 4.09 | 10.55 ± 3.51#∗ |
| FINS ( | 7.59 (4.33, 10.42) | 7.61 (4.57, 9.99) | 7.52 (4.11, 12.92) | 6.04 (4.20, 9.61)#∗ |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.81 ± 1.61 | 7.80 ± 1.59 | 7.84 ± 1.33 | 6.91 ± 1.48#∗ |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.76 ± 0.73 | 4.82 ± 0.88 | 4.94 ± 0.83 | 3.89 ± 0.63#∗ |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.32 (1.05, 2.38) | 1.31 (1.01, 2.23) | 1.29 (1.02, 2.75) | 1.18 (0.94, 2.13)#∗ |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.24 (0.98, 1.58) | 1.25 (1.03, 1.60) | 1.27 (1.03, 1.90) | 1.26 (0.96, 1.87) |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.89 ± 0.82 | 2.90 ± 0.74 | 2.95 ± 0.76 | 1.87 ± 0.77#∗ |
| ALT (U/L) | 26 (18, 35) | 25 (17, 35) | 21 (18, 40) | 24 (17, 35) |
| AST (U/L) | 22 (15, 31) | 21 (16, 32) | 19 (11, 35) | 21 (10, 30) |
| HTC (%) | 9.63 (5.87, 11.18) | 10.79 (6.75, 19.99)# | 9.81 (5.76, 15.09) | 6.54 (4.82, 13.08)#∗ |
Normally distributed data are presented as the mean ± SD; nonnormally distributed data are presented as the median with the 25th and 75th percentiles in parenthesis. # P < 0.05 versus pretreatment. *P < 0.05 versus the control group.