Literature DB >> 24319125

New software for cervical vertebral geometry assessment and its relationship to skeletal maturation--a pilot study.

R C Santiago1, A R Cunha, G C Júnior, N Fernandes, M J S Campos, L F M Costa, R W F Vitral, A M Bolognese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we developed new software for quantitative analysis of cervical vertebrae maturation, and we evaluated its applicability through a multinomial logistic regression model (MLRM).
METHODS: Digitized images of the bodies of the second (C2), third (C3) and fourth (C4) cervical vertebrae were analysed in cephalometric radiographs of 236 subjects (116 boys and 120 girls) by using a software developed for digitized vertebrae analysis. The sample was initially distributed into 11 categories according to the Fishman's skeletal maturity indicators and were then grouped into four stages for quantitative cervical maturational changes (QCMC) analysis (QCMC I, II, III and IV). Seven variables of interest were measured and analysed to identify morphologic alterations of the vertebral bodies in each QCMC category.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among all QCMC categories for the variables analysed. The MLRM used to calculate the probability that an individual belonged to each of the four cervical vertebrae maturation categories was constructed by taking into account gender, chronological age and four variables determined by digitized vertebrae analysis (Ang_C3, MP_C3, MP_C4 and SP_C4). The MLRM presented a predictability of 81.4%. The weighted κ test showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.832) between the categories defined initially by the method of Fishman and those allocated by the MLRM.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant alterations in the morphologies of the C2, C3 and C4 vertebral bodies that were analysed through the digitized vertebrae analysis software occur during the different stages of skeletal maturation. The model that combines the four parameters measured on the vertebral bodies, the age and the gender showed an excellent prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical vertebrae; logistic regression; skeletal maturity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24319125      PMCID: PMC4064620          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  29 in total

1.  Cervical vertebral bone age in girls.

Authors:  Toshinori Mito; Koshi Sato; Hideo Mitani
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth.

Authors:  Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlos Flores-Mir; Brian Nebbe; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae--a longitudinal cephalometric study.

Authors:  M T O'Reilly; G J Yanniello
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Maturational patterns and prediction during adolescence.

Authors:  L S Fishman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Prediction of the timing of the adolescent growth spurt from ossification events in hand-wrist films.

Authors:  W J Houston; J C Miller; J M Tanner
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1979-07

7.  Misuse of hand-wrist radiographs.

Authors:  R J Smith
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-01

8.  Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films.

Authors:  L S Fishman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height.

Authors:  L Franchi; T Baccetti; J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  Cervical vertebral maturation as a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Rodrigo César Santiago; Luiz Felipe de Miranda Costa; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Ana Maria Bolognese; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cervical vertebral maturation assessment on lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence: comparison of machine learning classifier models.

Authors:  Hakan Amasya; Derya Yildirim; Turgay Aydogan; Nazan Kemaloglu; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of the Artificial Neural Network and Naive Bayes Models Trained with Vertebra Ratios for Growth and Development Determination.

Authors:  Hatice Kök; Mehmet Said İzgi; Ayşe Merve Acılar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  Computer Based Assessment of Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stages Using Digital Lateral Cephalograms.

Authors:  Vildana Dzemidzic; Emir Sokic; Alisa Tiro; Enita Nakas
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.