Literature DB >> 24319022

AVM Management Equipoise Survey: physician opinions regarding the management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Kevin M Cockroft1, Ki-Eun Chang2, Erik B Lehman3, Robert E Harbaugh4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is controversial, and conducting clinical trials in this area has been a challenge. We sought to determine which, if any, patient/AVM characteristics were most likely to influence clinicians' decisions regarding management and clinical trial enrollment.
METHODS: We performed an online survey (Survey Monkey) of members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) (n=4836) and Society of NeuroInterventional Surgeons (SNIS) (n=512). Physicians were asked to rate the likelihood that various patient/AVM characteristics would influence their treatment decisions and recommendations for clinical trial enrollment. 10 hypothetical case vignettes were also provided, and respondents were asked to select a management recommendation.
RESULTS: 277 (5.2%) responses were received. Characteristics that the majority (>50%) of respondents felt should lead to treatment included size <3 cm, superficial or cerebellar location, single draining vein, age <30 years, venous aneurysm, prior AVM hemorrhage, poorly controlled seizures, intranidal aneurysm, and patient's desire for treatment. However, a significant minority (>30%) felt that six of these same characteristics should lead to observation or should not influence treatment decisions. Characteristics that the majority (>50%) of respondents felt should lead to clinical trial enrollment included size > 6 cm, deep or eloquent location, and age 51-70 years. The only characteristic that the majority felt should not lead to enrollment was the presence of an intranidal aneurysm. For the 10 vignettes, the majority of respondents (>50%) favored a specific course of management in only five cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' opinions on which patient/AVM characteristics are important for decisions regarding treatment or trial enrollment vary widely. These results suggest that there is no uniform opinion of clinical equipoise with regard to the management of brain AVMs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteriovenous Malformation; Brain; Intervention; Observation; Clinical Trials; Stroke; Hemorrhagic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24319022     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  7 in total

1.  Does eloquence subtype influence outcome following arteriovenous malformation surgery?

Authors:  Justin R Mascitelli; Seungwon Yoon; Tyler S Cole; Helen Kim; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Spanish Version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Awareness and Use in United States. A Survey Study.

Authors:  Enrique Villalobos; Scott R Barnes; Ihtesham A Qureshi; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Alberto Maud; Gustavo J Rodriguez
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-01

3.  Factors Influencing Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing Practices for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Lester Y Leung; Mark McAllister; Magdy Selim; Marc Fisher
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.967

Review 4.  Regression of a symptomatic varix after transarterial embolization of a brain arteriovenous malformation: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Guichen Li; Guangming Wang; Jing Yu; Kun Hou; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Treatment of Brain AVMs (TOBAS): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim E Darsaut; Elsa Magro; Jean-Christophe Gentric; André Lima Batista; Chiraz Chaalala; David Roberge; Michel W Bojanowski; Alain Weill; Daniel Roy; Jean Raymond
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Expert Consensus on the Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Yoko Kato; Van He Dong; Feres Chaddad; Katsumi Takizawa; Tsuyoshi Izumo; Hitoshi Fukuda; Takayuki Hara; Kenichiro Kikuta; Yasunobu Nakai; Toshiki Endo; Hiroki Kurita; Bin Xu; Vladimír Beneš; Raftopoulos Christian; Giacomo Pavesi; Mojgan Hodaie; Rajan Kumar Sharma; Harshal Agarwal; Krishna Mohan; Boon Seng Liew
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11-25

7.  Measuring clinical uncertainty and equipoise by applying the agreement study methodology to patient management decisions.

Authors:  Robert Fahed; Tim E Darsaut; Behzad Farzin; Miguel Chagnon; Jean Raymond
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.