Literature DB >> 24318628

Intense and specialized dendritic localization of the fragile X mental retardation protein in binaural brainstem neurons: a comparative study in the alligator, chicken, gerbil, and human.

Yuan Wang1, Hitomi Sakano, Karisa Beebe, Maile R Brown, Rian de Laat, Mark Bothwell, Randy J Kulesza, Edwin W Rubel.   

Abstract

Neuronal dendrites are structurally and functionally dynamic in response to changes in afferent activity. The fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is an mRNA binding protein that regulates activity-dependent protein synthesis and morphological dynamics of dendrites. Loss and abnormal expression of FMRP occur in fragile X syndrome (FXS) and some forms of autism spectrum disorders. To provide further understanding of how FMRP signaling regulates dendritic dynamics, we examined dendritic expression and localization of FMRP in the reptilian and avian nucleus laminaris (NL) and its mammalian analogue, the medial superior olive (MSO), in rodents and humans. NL/MSO neurons are specialized for temporal processing of low-frequency sounds for binaural hearing, which is impaired in FXS. Protein BLAST analyses first demonstrate that the FMRP amino acid sequences in the alligator and chicken are highly similar to human FMRP with identical mRNA-binding and phosphorylation sites, suggesting that FMRP functions similarly across vertebrates. Immunocytochemistry further reveals that NL/MSO neurons have very high levels of dendritic FMRP in low-frequency hearing vertebrates including alligator, chicken, gerbil, and human. Remarkably, dendritic FMRP in NL/MSO neurons often accumulates at branch points and enlarged distal tips, loci known to be critical for branch-specific dendritic arbor dynamics. These observations support an important role for FMRP in regulating dendritic properties of binaural neurons that are essential for low-frequency sound localization and auditory scene segregation, and support the relevance of studying this regulation in nonhuman vertebrates that use low frequencies in order to further understand human auditory processing disorders.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain evolution; dendritic regulation; fragile X syndrome; low-frequency temporal processing; medial superior olive; nucleus laminaris

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24318628      PMCID: PMC5564206          DOI: 10.1002/cne.23520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  102 in total

1.  Resolution of spatial and temporal visual attention in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Probing astrocyte function in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Shelley Jacobs; Connie Cheng; Laurie C Doering
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

3.  Comprehensive motor testing in Fmr1-KO mice exposes temporal defects in oromotor coordination.

Authors:  Snigdha Roy; Yu Zhao; Melody Allensworth; Mohamed F Farook; Mark S LeDoux; Lawrence T Reiter; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Analysis of neocortex in three males with the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  V J Hinton; W T Brown; K Wisniewski; R D Rudelli
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1991-12-01

5.  Transport of fragile X mental retardation protein via granules in neurites of PC12 cells.

Authors:  Yolanda De Diego Otero; Lies-Anne Severijnen; Gert van Cappellen; Mariëtte Schrier; Ben Oostra; Rob Willemsen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  In situ detection of individual mRNA molecules and protein complexes or post-translational modifications using padlock probes combined with the in situ proximity ligation assay.

Authors:  Irene Weibrecht; Elin Lundin; Sara Kiflemariam; Marco Mignardi; Ida Grundberg; Chatarina Larsson; Björn Koos; Mats Nilsson; Ola Söderberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  A versatile and simple method for staining nervous tissue using Giemsa dye.

Authors:  C Iñiguez; M J Gayoso; J Carreres
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Morphological features of the medial superior olive in autism.

Authors:  Randy J Kulesza; Kathleen Mangunay
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Cary S Kogan; Isabelle Boutet; Kim Cornish; Shahin Zangenehpour; Kathy T Mullen; Jeanette J A Holden; Vazken M Der Kaloustian; Eva Andermann; Avi Chaudhuri
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Fragile X syndrome: associated neurological abnormalities and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  K E Wisniewski; J H French; S Fernando; W T Brown; E C Jenkins; E Friedman; A L Hill; C M Miezejeski
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  21 in total

1.  Postsynaptic FMRP Regulates Synaptogenesis In Vivo in the Developing Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Diego A R Zorio; Leslayann Schecterson; Yong Lu; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Deletion of Fmr1 from Forebrain Excitatory Neurons Triggers Abnormal Cellular, EEG, and Behavioral Phenotypes in the Auditory Cortex of a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Maham Rais; Arnold R Palacios; Xinghao S Shuai; Steven Bishay; Otilia Popa; Patricia S Pirbhoy; Devin K Binder; David L Nelson; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Differential conduction velocity regulation in ipsilateral and contralateral collaterals innervating brainstem coincidence detector neurons.

Authors:  Armin H Seidl; Edwin W Rubel; Andrés Barría
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Sensory processing in autism spectrum disorders and Fragile X syndrome-From the clinic to animal models.

Authors:  D Sinclair; B Oranje; K A Razak; S J Siegel; S Schmid
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  De novo sequencing and initial annotation of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) genome.

Authors:  Diego A R Zorio; Scott Monsma; Dan H Sanes; Nace L Golding; Edwin W Rubel; Yuan Wang
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Abnormal development of auditory responses in the inferior colliculus of a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna O Nguyen; Devin K Binder; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cellular distribution of the fragile X mental retardation protein in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Diego A R Zorio; Christine M Jackson; Yong Liu; Edwin W Rubel; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deletion rescues auditory evoked potential habituation deficit in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Teresa H Wen; Sarah Reinhard; Mike S Hsu; Harpreet Sidhu; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Proteomic analyses of nucleus laminaris identified candidate targets of the fragile X mental retardation protein.

Authors:  Hitomi Sakano; Diego A R Zorio; Xiaoyu Wang; Ying S Ting; William S Noble; Michael J MacCoss; Edwin W Rubel; Yuan Wang
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Axonal localization of the fragile X family of RNA binding proteins is conserved across mammals.

Authors:  Katherine A Shepard; Lulu I T Korsak; Danielle DeBartolo; Michael R Akins
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.