Literature DB >> 24317142

Efficacy of achieving pregnancy with fertility-focused intercourse.

Qiyan Mu1, Richard J Fehring.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare pregnancy rates when women have intercourse on self-estimated high and peak fertile days and when they only have intercourse on low fertile days during the fertile window (FW). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a prospective observational cohort study design. Our convenience sample included 124 women who utilized our online charting Web sites to achieve pregnancy from January 2010 to November 2012. Participants used an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) or self-observed cervical mucus or both to determine fertility during the estimated FW. Pregnancy rates were determined with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Chi square analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of achieving pregnancy between two different intercourse patterns.
RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was 87 per 100 women at 12 months when intercourse happened on high or peak days and 5 per 100 when intercourse occurred only on low days of the FW. Chi square analysis showed a greater proportion of pregnancies with intercourse on high and peak fertile days of the menstrual cycle (x2 = 40.2, p < .001, df = 1). NURSING IMPLICATIONS: Focusing intercourse on high or peak fertile days during the estimated FW enhances the probability of achieving a desired pregnancy. Fertility awareness-based online charting system is effective in helping women to determine their FW and target intercourse accordingly to achieve pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24317142     DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a76b88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik; Pilar Vigil
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Fecundability in relation to use of mobile computing apps to track the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Sydney K Willis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Diverse radiofrequency sensitivity and radiofrequency effects of mobile or cordless phone near fields exposure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Styliani Geronikolou; Stelios Zimeras; Constantinos H Davos; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Stephanos Tsitomeneas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Thijssen; A Meier; K Panis; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

5.  Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: Subarm of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Weddell; Georgina L Jones; Sheila Duffy; Cameron Hogg; Sarah Johnson; William Ledger
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

6.  Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Paul A Carpentier; Barbara L Meier; Mark Rollo; Benjamin Tingey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window.

Authors:  Thomas P Bouchard; Richard J Fehring; Mary M Schneider
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.