Literature DB >> 24316238

Cross-linguistic sound symbolism and crossmodal correspondence: Evidence from fMRI and DTI.

Kate Pirog Revill1, Laura L Namy2, Lauren Clepper DeFife2, Lynne C Nygaard2.   

Abstract

Non-arbitrary correspondences between spoken words and categories of meanings exist in natural language, with mounting evidence that listeners are sensitive to this sound symbolic information. Native English speakers were asked to choose the meaning of spoken foreign words from one of four corresponding antonym pairs selected from a previously developed multi-language stimulus set containing both sound symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli. In behavioral (n=9) and fMRI (n=15) experiments, participants showed reliable sensitivity to the sound symbolic properties of the stimulus set, selecting the consistent meaning for the sound symbolic words at above chances rates. There was increased activation for sound symbolic relative to non-symbolic words in left superior parietal cortex, and a cluster in left superior longitudinal fasciculus showed a positive correlation between fractional anisotropy (FA) and an individual's sensitivity to sound symbolism. These findings support the idea that crossmodal correspondences underlie sound symbolism in spoken language.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crossmodal correspondences; DTI; Sound symbolism; Spoken language; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24316238     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  12 in total

1.  The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Lynne C Nygaard; Laura L Namy
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

2.  Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes.

Authors:  Kelly McCormick; Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; Lynne C Nygaard; K Sathian
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  What is the link between synaesthesia and sound symbolism?

Authors:  Kaitlyn Bankieris; Julia Simner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 4.  Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism.

Authors:  Gwilym Lockwood; Mark Dingemanse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-24

5.  Ideophones in Japanese modulate the P2 and late positive complex responses.

Authors:  Gwilym Lockwood; Jyrki Tuomainen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 6.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings.

Authors:  Klemens Knoeferle; Jixing Li; Emanuela Maggioni; Charles Spence
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sound iconicity of abstract concepts: Place of articulation is implicitly associated with abstract concepts of size and social dominance.

Authors:  Jan Auracher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Affective iconic words benefit from additional sound-meaning integration in the left amygdala.

Authors:  Arash Aryani; Chun-Ting Hsu; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Glyph guessing for 'oo' and 'ee': spatial frequency information in sound symbolic matching for ancient and unfamiliar scripts.

Authors:  Nora Turoman; Suzy J Styles
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.