Jennifer Klauschie1, Yan Wen2, Bertha Chen2, Lu Zhou2, Raphael Nunez-Nateras3, Idris T Ocal4, Dora Lam-Himlin4, Rosanne Kho5. 1. Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix. Electronic address: Jennifer@academic-urology.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix. 4. Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix. 5. Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the histologic characteristics of vaginal tissue in patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) after robotic hysterectomy and to compare this group with patients without dehiscence. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS: Seven patients with VCD and 6 patients without VCD. INTERVENTIONS: Vaginal cuff tissue was obtained from all patients and was stained using hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated for acute and chronic inflammation markers including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. Immunohistochemical staining was performed and evaluated using the semiquantitative method for collagen types I and III, smooth muscle actin, and SM22α (myofibroblast) content. Grading was performed by 4 blinded investigators. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the 2 groups, and correlation coefficients for interobserver variability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VCD group, compared with the non-VCD group, demonstrated significantly greater numbers of neutrophils (1.71 vs 1.0; p = .04), lymphocytes (2.85 vs 1.33; p = .002), and plasma cells (2.2 vs 1.0; p = .001). There was no statistical difference between the groups in amounts of collagen I (1.71 vs 1.27; p = .09) and collagen III (1.66 vs 1.38; p = .37), smooth muscle actin (1.23 vs 1.33; p = .65), and SM22α (1.85 vs 1.27; p = .09). Interobserver variability was low (κ = 0.86; p = .76). CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, patients with VCD demonstrated significantly higher levels of acute and chronic inflammatory cells. This finding suggests that a prolonged inflammatory phase may be delaying normal progression to reparation in patients with dehiscence.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the histologic characteristics of vaginal tissue in patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) after robotic hysterectomy and to compare this group with patients without dehiscence. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS: Seven patients with VCD and 6 patients without VCD. INTERVENTIONS: Vaginal cuff tissue was obtained from all patients and was stained using hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated for acute and chronic inflammation markers including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. Immunohistochemical staining was performed and evaluated using the semiquantitative method for collagen types I and III, smooth muscle actin, and SM22α (myofibroblast) content. Grading was performed by 4 blinded investigators. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the 2 groups, and correlation coefficients for interobserver variability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The VCD group, compared with the non-VCD group, demonstrated significantly greater numbers of neutrophils (1.71 vs 1.0; p = .04), lymphocytes (2.85 vs 1.33; p = .002), and plasma cells (2.2 vs 1.0; p = .001). There was no statistical difference between the groups in amounts of collagen I (1.71 vs 1.27; p = .09) and collagen III (1.66 vs 1.38; p = .37), smooth muscle actin (1.23 vs 1.33; p = .65), and SM22α (1.85 vs 1.27; p = .09). Interobserver variability was low (κ = 0.86; p = .76). CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, patients with VCD demonstrated significantly higher levels of acute and chronic inflammatory cells. This finding suggests that a prolonged inflammatory phase may be delaying normal progression to reparation in patients with dehiscence.
Authors: L van den Haak; J P T Rhemrev; M D Blikkendaal; A C M Luteijn; J J van den Dobbelsteen; S R C Driessen; F W Jansen Journal: Gynecol Surg Date: 2016-01-12