Literature DB >> 24315810

Relative changes in ankle and hip control during bilateral joint movements in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Matthew C Chua1, Allison S Hyngstrom2, Alexander V Ng3, Brian D Schmit4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify hip and ankle impairments contributing to movement dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: Volitional phasing of bilateral hip and ankle torques was assessed using a load-cell-instrumented servomotor drive system in ten participants with MS and 10 age-matched healthy participants. The hips and ankles were separately bilaterally oscillated 180° out of phase (40° range of motion) at a frequency of 0.75 Hz while the other joints were held stationary. Participants were instructed to assist in the same direction as the robot-imposed movement. The hip and ankle torques were measured and work was calculated for each movement.
RESULTS: Total negative work at the ankle was significantly different between groups (p=0.040). The participants with MS produced larger negative work during hip flexion (p=0.042) and ankle flexion (p=0.037). Negative work at the hip was significantly correlated with the Berg Balance Scores and Timed 25 Feet Walk Test, and trends demonstrated increasing negative work with increasing clinical impairment in MS.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest an increased importance of the hip in functional balance and gait in MS. SIGNIFICANCE: Rehabilitation strategies targeting ankle recovery or compensation using the hip might improve movement function in MS.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coordination; Joint moment; Negative work; Robot

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315810      PMCID: PMC4020969          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  42 in total

1.  Muscle coordination patterns for efficient cycling.

Authors:  Ollie M Blake; Yvan Champoux; James M Wakeling
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Muscle coordination is key to the power output and mechanical efficiency of limb movements.

Authors:  J M Wakeling; O M Blake; H K Chan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Exaggerated interlimb neural coupling following stroke.

Authors:  Tiffany L Kline; Brian D Schmit; Derek G Kamper
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Muscular and gait abnormalities in persons with early onset multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alon Kalron; Anat Achiron; Zeevi Dvir
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Flexor reflexes in chronic spinal cord injury triggered by imposed ankle rotation.

Authors:  B D Schmit; A McKenna-Cole; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Impaired stretch reflex and joint torque modulation during spastic gait in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  T Sinkjaer; J B Andersen; J F Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  The robustness of age-related gait adaptations: can running counterbalance the consequences of ageing?

Authors:  Hans H C M Savelberg; Lex B Verdijk; Paul J B Willems; Kenneth Meijer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Different types of disturbed motor control in gait of hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  E Knutsson; C Richards
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Gait mechanics are different between healthy controls and patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessie M Huisinga; Kendra K Schmid; Mary L Filipi; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Modulation of coordinated muscle activity during imposed sinusoidal hip movements in human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert E Steldt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.