Literature DB >> 24315568

Fertility after breast cancer treatment.

Miro Kasum1, Lidija Beketić-Orešković2, Parvin F Peddi3, Slavko Orešković4, Rebecca H Johnson5.   

Abstract

In many countries of the developed world, there is an increasing trend toward delay in childbearing from 30 to 40 years of age for various reasons. This is unfortunately concordant with an increasing incidence of breast cancer in women who have not yet completed their family. The current choice for premenopausal women with breast cancer is adjuvant therapy which includes cytotoxic chemotherapy, ovarian ablation (by surgery, irradiation, or chemical ovarian suppression), anti-estrogen therapy, or any combination of these. Although the use of adjuvant therapies with cytotoxic drugs can significantly reduce mortality, it raises issues of the long-term toxicity, such as induction of an early menopause and fertility impairment. The risk of infertility is a potential hardship to be faced by the patients following treatment of breast cancer. The offspring of patients who became pregnant after completion of chemotherapy have shown no adverse effects and congenital anomalies from the treatment, but sometimes high rates of abortion (29%) and premature deliveries with low birth weight (40%) have been demonstrated. Therefore, the issue of recent cytotoxic treatment remains controversial and further research is required to define a "safety period" between cessation of treatment and pregnancy. Preservation of fertility in breast cancer survivors of reproductive age has become an important issue regarding the quality of life. Currently, there are several potential options, including all available assisted technologies, such as in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, in vitro maturation, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. Because increased estrogen levels are thought to be potentially risky in breast cancer patients, recently developed ovarian stimulation protocols with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole and tamoxifen appear to provide safe stimulation with endogenous estrogen. Embryo cryopreservation seems to be the most established fertility preservation strategy, providing a 25-35% chance of pregnancy. In addition, oocyte freezing can be considered as an alternative in patients who are single and in those who do not wish a sperm donor. Although ovarian tissue harvesting appears to be safe, experience regarding ovarian transplantation is still limited due to low utilization, so the true value of this procedure remains to be determined. Nevertheless, in clinical situations in which chemotherapy needs to be started in young patients facing premature ovarian failure, ovarian tissue preservation seems to be a promising option for restoring fertility, especially in conjunction with other options like immature oocyte retrieval, in vitro maturation of oocytes, oocyte vitrification, or embryo cryopreservation. It seems that in vitro maturation is a useful strategy because it improves oocyte or cryopreservation outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Fertility; Pregnancy; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315568     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  13 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer: an update on treatment-related infertility.

Authors:  Erica Silvestris; Miriam Dellino; Paola Cafforio; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Gennaro Cormio; Stella D'Oronzo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The impact of chemotherapy for breast cancer on sexual function and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Juliane Farthmann; A Hanjalic-Beck; J Veit; B Rautenberg; E Stickeler; T Erbes; M Földi; A Hasenburg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rahul Banerjee; Ekaterini Tsiapali
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Fertility Preservation for the Young Breast Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Shari B Goldfarb; Sabrina A Kamer; Bridget A Oppong; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Manuela J Junqueira; Cristina Olcese; Joanne F Kelvin; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Heather Sipsma; Lorna Finnegan; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 6.  Current Understanding of the Etiology, Symptomatology, and Treatment Options in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI).

Authors:  Bunpei Ishizuka
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Adolescent use of hair dyes, straighteners and perms in relation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Allyson M Gregoire; Kyla W Taylor; Carolyn Eberle; Symielle Gaston; Katie M O'Brien; Chandra L Jackson; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 7.316

8.  Fertility preservation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a premenopausal breast cancer patient: a case report.

Authors:  Arika Kobayashi; Ryoichi Matsunuma; Kei Yamaguchi; Ryosuke Hayami; Michiko Tsuneizumi; Kazuhiko Nakagami
Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports       Date:  2019-12-09

Review 9.  Premature ovarian insufficiency: the context of long-term effects.

Authors:  A Podfigurna-Stopa; A Czyzyk; M Grymowicz; R Smolarczyk; K Katulski; K Czajkowski; B Meczekalski
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 10.  Ovarian Follicle Depletion Induced by Chemotherapy and the Investigational Stages of Potential Fertility-Protective Treatments-A Review.

Authors:  Xia Hao; Amandine Anastácio; Kui Liu; Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.