Literature DB >> 24315503

Cigarette smoking as a stigma: evidence from France.

Patrick Peretti-Watel1, Stéphane Legleye2, Romain Guignard3, François Beck4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that cigarette smoking has become a stigmatized behaviour, at least in western countries, and there is ongoing debate among experts about whether or not such stigma should be an instrument of anti-tobacco policy.
METHODS: We investigated French non-smokers attitudes toward cigarette smokers, using data from a telephone survey carried out in 2010 among a representative random sample of non-smokers aged 15-75 (N=3091). We carried out a cluster analysis to build contrasted attitudinal profiles and we also computed a score of stigmatization.
RESULTS: We found evidence for the existence of stigma associated with cigarette smoking in France: a majority of French non-smokers would not date a smoker, nor hire one to take care of their children. The cluster analysis identified four contrasting profiles, corresponding to different levels of stigmatization, including one cluster whose respondents demonstrated strong levels of moral condemnation and social rejection of smokers. Older people, those with a lower educational level and those reporting financial difficulties were more prone to stigmatize smokers, while those who reported that somebody smoked in their home were less likely to do so. Those who had never smoked and those who abstained from alcohol were more prone to stigmatize smokers. Obese people were also more likely to do so (in bivariate analysis only).
CONCLUSION: The process of tobacco stigmatization seems well-advanced in France, despite a cultural context that may be less permeable to this process. Further research is needed as our results raise some questions regarding its efficiency as a policy tool. First, people who are familiar with smokers are less prone to stigmatize them. More generally, simultaneously stigmatizing several categories of people may provide each of these same categories with stereotyped 'others' onto whom they can deflect their stigma.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cigarette smoking; France; Healthism; Motives for stigma; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315503     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  7 in total

1.  Smoking-Related Stigma Expressed by Physiotherapists toward Individuals with Lung Disease.

Authors:  Bethany Bass; Elizabeth Lake; Chelsea Elvy; Sarah Fodemesi; Mara Iacoe; Emilie Mazik; Dina Brooks; Annemarie Lee
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Exploring Smoking Stigma, Alternative Tobacco Product Use, & Quit Attempts.

Authors:  Cati G Brown-Johnson; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  What differentiates youths who use e-cigarettes from those who smoke traditional tobacco products?

Authors:  Hugo Torregrossa; Bertrand Dautzenberg; Pierre Birkui; Nicole Rieu; Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg; Maria Melchior; Murielle Mary-Krause
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  Occupying multiple stigmatized identities: Smoking and unemployment stigmas among the unemployed.

Authors:  Priya Fielding-Singh; Erin A Vogel; Judith J Prochaska
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-05-15

5.  Plain tobacco packaging, increased graphic health warnings and adolescents' perceptions and initiation of smoking: DePICT, a French nationwide study.

Authors:  Fabienne El-Khoury Lesueur; Camille Bolze; Ramchandar Gomajee; Vicki White; Maria Melchior
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  How will e-cigarettes affect health inequalities? Applying Bourdieu to smoking and cessation.

Authors:  Frances Thirlway
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.