Literature DB >> 24315363

Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach.

Oriol Rodriguez-Leor1, Eduard Fernandez-Nofrerias2, Xavier Carrillo2, Josepa Mauri2, Carlos Labata2, Carolina Oliete2, Maria del Carmen Rivas2, Antoni Bayes-Genis3.   

Abstract

Previous trials in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not shown a definitive benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) by transfemoral approach over thrombolysis. The transradial approach (TRA) is associated with a significant decrease in mortality, MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Event), and serious access site complications compared with the transfemoral approach. We have evaluated clinical outcomes in a cohort of real-life unselected ≥75-year-old patients with STEMI treated by TRA-PPCI. This is a single-center prospective, observational registry of consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI between February 2007 and February 2013. MACE was defined as death, reinfarction, or stroke. A total of 307 patients were treated by PPCI, 293 (95.1%) with TRA-PPCI (mean age 80 ± 2 years, 42% women). Patients had high co-morbidity levels (cardiogenic shock on admission 8.5%, previous myocardial infarction 11.6%, diabetes 30.4%, previous renal failure 25.6%, previous PCI 9.6%, and peripheral arterial disease 14.3%); IIbIIIa inhibitors were used in 45.1% of patients. Severe bleeding and need for transfusion were recorded for 6.5% and 9.9% of patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were 11.9%, 17.4%, and 22.2%, respectively. Excluding 25 patients with cardiogenic shock on admission, the in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were 7.8%, 13.1%, and 17.9%, respectively. In conclusion, TRA-PPCI was feasible in the vast majority of elderly patients with STEMI. In-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year MACE were lower than reported for transfemoral access, suggesting a benefit of the TRA in these patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315363     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Transradial intervention in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ahmad H S Mustafa; Eric Holroyd; Rob Butler; Doug Fraser; Magdi El-Omar; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Elderly Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Patient-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Benoit Lattuca; Mathieu Kerneis; Michel Zeitouni; Guillaume Cayla; Paul Guedeney; Jean-Philippe Collet; Gilles Montalescot; Johanne Silvain
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry.

Authors:  Olga Toleva; Quazi Ibrahim; Neil Brass; Sunil Sookram; Robert Welsh
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-06-24

Review 4.  Transradial approach for coronary procedures in the elderly population.

Authors:  Shamsi Aamir; Shah Mohammed; Rathore Sudhir
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.