Literature DB >> 24315310

Matched comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: an initial experience.

Sapan N Ambani1, Alon Z Weizer2, J Stuart Wolf2, Chang He2, David C Miller2, Jeffrey S Montgomery2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare our initial robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy (RAN) experience with a well-established practice of performing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LN) to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained minimally invasive surgery database. Patients who underwent RAN from April 2009 to December 2011 were matched by pathologic tumor stage and age (± 10 years) to those who underwent LN.
RESULTS: Twenty-two matched pairs were evaluated. Mean operative time (298 vs 251 minutes) and estimated blood loss (EBL, 380 vs 233 mL) were significantly higher for RAN, with a greater need for transfusion in this group. Complication rates were similar. The RAN group trended toward more frequent lymph node dissection and greater median node count when lymph node dissection was performed (59% vs 27% [P = .07] and 5.5 vs 1.0 [P = .13]). After a median follow-up of 10 months for RAN and 15 months for LN, no significant difference was seen in the rate of bladder (36% vs 37%) or distant (32% vs 23%) recurrence, with similar median time to any recurrence (9 months vs 4 months, P = .32).
CONCLUSION: RAN was associated with higher operative time and blood loss likely because of more frequent use of node dissection, robot repositioning, and technical inexperience. Lymph node dissection was more frequently performed with RAN, which reflects surgeon practice patterns. When a lymph node dissection was performed, the median node count was greater with RAN. Our initial experience with RAN suggests that this is an acceptable approach for the management of UTUC.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315310     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Concurrent upper and lower urinary tract robotic surgery: A case series.

Authors:  Sailaja Pisipati; Christian Bach; Datesh Daneshwar; Edward W Rowe; Anthony J Koupparis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care?

Authors:  Sumit Saini; Ram Anil Pathak; Ashok Kumar Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 3.  Robot assisted lymphadenectomy in urology: pelvic, retroperitoneal and inguinal.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Surena F Matin; Nazareno Suardi; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; James Porter; Robert J Stein; Rene Sotelo; Franco Gaboardi; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2016-11-08

Review 4.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xin Ling Teo; Sey Kiat Lim
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-04

5.  Comparative study of lymph node dissection, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract undergoing regional lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Takashige Abe; Tsunenori Kondo; Toru Harabayashi; Norikata Takada; Ryuji Matsumoto; Takahiro Osawa; Keita Minami; Satoshi Nagamori; Satoru Maruyama; Sachiyo Murai; Kazunari Tanabe; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Comparison of oncological and perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic nephroureterectomy approaches in patients with non-metastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hakmin Lee; Hak Ju Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies.

Authors:  Ruoyu Ji; Zhangyuting He; Shiyuan Fang; Wenjie Yang; Mengchao Wei; Jie Dong; Weifeng Xu; Zhigang Ji
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Upper urinary tract disease: what we know today and unmet needs.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Ilaria Lucca; Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-06

9.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison Study.

Authors:  Che-Yuan Hu; Cheng-Kuang Yang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Yen-Chuan Ou; Shun-Fa Hung; Shiu-Dong Chung; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Laparoscopic vs robotic nephroureterectomy: Is it time to re-establish the standard? Evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Stonier; Nick Simson; Su-Min Lee; Ian Robertson; Tarik Amer; Bhaskar K Somani; Bhavan P Rai; Omar Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-06-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.