Landon Grange1, Monica Dalal1, Robert B Nussenblatt1, H Nida Sen2. 1. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: senh@nei.nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide a detailed review of current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, work-up and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy and to preview briefly possible future therapies. DESIGN: Perspective based on literature review and clinical expertise. METHODS: Interpretation of current literature, relying on the authors' clinical experience. RESULTS: Autoimmune retinopathy is a rare immunologic disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiretinal antibodies along with electroretinographic and visual field abnormalities. An ophthalmic examination can be normal or show minimal findings. The diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy is made difficult by diagnostic criteria that are both limited and nonstandardized. Currently, the diagnosis is made based on the demonstration of serum antiretinal antibodies and the presence of clinical manifestations (including abnormal electroretinographic findings). The mere presence of these antibodies is not diagnostic. Lack of an accepted gold standard for antiretinal antibodies detection and poor interlaboratory concordance make the diagnosis challenging. There are anecdotal reports of immunosuppressive therapy in autoimmune retinopathy; however, the response to treatment is variable, with more favorable results achieved in paraneoplastic retinopathy, particularly cancer-associated retinopathy, with a combination of chemotherapy and immunosuppression. Whether an earlier attempt to treat nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy would be more beneficial is unknown. Early treatment attempts are limited by lack of sensitive and specific assays and definitive clinical criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the clinical course, prognosis and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy. Additional studies should examine the specificity and pathogenicity of antiretinal antibodies and screen for biomarkers, and they should be conducted concurrently with studies seeking to identify appropriate treatment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To provide a detailed review of current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, work-up and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy and to preview briefly possible future therapies. DESIGN: Perspective based on literature review and clinical expertise. METHODS: Interpretation of current literature, relying on the authors' clinical experience. RESULTS:Autoimmune retinopathy is a rare immunologic disease characterized by the presence of circulating antiretinal antibodies along with electroretinographic and visual field abnormalities. An ophthalmic examination can be normal or show minimal findings. The diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy is made difficult by diagnostic criteria that are both limited and nonstandardized. Currently, the diagnosis is made based on the demonstration of serum antiretinal antibodies and the presence of clinical manifestations (including abnormal electroretinographic findings). The mere presence of these antibodies is not diagnostic. Lack of an accepted gold standard for antiretinal antibodies detection and poor interlaboratory concordance make the diagnosis challenging. There are anecdotal reports of immunosuppressive therapy in autoimmune retinopathy; however, the response to treatment is variable, with more favorable results achieved in paraneoplastic retinopathy, particularly cancer-associated retinopathy, with a combination of chemotherapy and immunosuppression. Whether an earlier attempt to treat nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy would be more beneficial is unknown. Early treatment attempts are limited by lack of sensitive and specific assays and definitive clinical criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the clinical course, prognosis and treatment of autoimmune retinopathy. Additional studies should examine the specificity and pathogenicity of antiretinal antibodies and screen for biomarkers, and they should be conducted concurrently with studies seeking to identify appropriate treatment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Nathalie Vermeulen; Ingrid Arijs; Sofie Joossens; Severine Vermeire; Stefan Clerens; Karolien Van den Bergh; Georges Michiels; Lutgarde Arckens; Frans Schuit; Leentje Van Lommel; Paul Rutgeerts; Xavier Bossuyt Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Farzin Forooghian; Ian M Macdonald; John R Heckenlively; Elise Héon; Lynn K Gordon; John J Hooks; Barbara Detrick; Robert B Nussenblatt Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Audrey C Ko; Jason P Brinton; Vinit B Mahajan; Bridget Zimmerman; Gregory S Brinton; Edwin M Stone; James C Folk; Robert F Mullins Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Steven Yeh; Farzin Forooghian; Wai T Wong; Lisa J Faia; Catherine Cukras; Julie C Lew; Keith Wroblewski; Eric D Weichel; Catherine B Meyerle; Hatice Nida Sen; Emily Y Chew; Robert B Nussenblatt Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-01
Authors: Xiaorong Gu; Susan Gillette Meer; Masaru Miyagi; Mary E Rayborn; Joe G Hollyfield; John W Crabb; Robert G Salomon Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J H Lee; S B Cho; D Bang; S H Oh; K-J Ahn; J Kim; Y-B Park; S-K Lee; K H Lee Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Cynthia X Qian; Kari Branham; Naheed Khan; Steven K Lundy; John R Heckenlively; Thiran Jayasundera Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Júlia T Takiuti; Vitor K L Takahashi; Christine L Xu; Ruben Jauregui; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Avni P Finn; Akshay S Thomas; Sandra S Stinnett; Robert T Keenan; Dilraj S Grewal; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 3.117