Princess E Osei-Bonsu1, Barbara G Bokhour2, Mark E Glickman2, Stephanie Rodrigues3, Nora M Mueller4, Natalie S Dell4, Shibei Zhao4, Susan V Eisen2, A Rani Elwy2. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA. Electronic address: Princess.Osei-Bonsu@va.gov. 2. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA. 3. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA. 4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Veterans' coping strategies on mental health treatment engagement following a positive screen for depression. METHODS: A mixed-methods observational study using a mailed survey and semi-structured interviews. Sample included 271 Veterans who screened positive for depression during a primary care visit at one of three VA medical centers and had not received a diagnosis of depression or prescribed antidepressants 12 months prior to screening. A subsample of 23 Veterans was interviewed. RESULTS: Logistic regression models showed that Veterans who reported more instrumental support and active coping were more likely to receive depression or other mental health treatment within three months of their positive depression screen. Those who reported emotional support or self-distraction as coping strategies were less likely to receive any treatment in the same time frame. Qualitative analyses revealed that how Veterans use these and other coping strategies can impact treatment engagement in a variety of ways. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between Veterans' use of coping strategies and treatment engagement for depression may not be readily apparent without in-depth exploration. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In VA primary care clinics, nurse care managers and behavioral health providers should explore how Veterans' methods of coping may impact treatment engagement. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Veterans' coping strategies on mental health treatment engagement following a positive screen for depression. METHODS: A mixed-methods observational study using a mailed survey and semi-structured interviews. Sample included 271 Veterans who screened positive for depression during a primary care visit at one of three VA medical centers and had not received a diagnosis of depression or prescribed antidepressants 12 months prior to screening. A subsample of 23 Veterans was interviewed. RESULTS: Logistic regression models showed that Veterans who reported more instrumental support and active coping were more likely to receive depression or other mental health treatment within three months of their positive depression screen. Those who reported emotional support or self-distraction as coping strategies were less likely to receive any treatment in the same time frame. Qualitative analyses revealed that how Veterans use these and other coping strategies can impact treatment engagement in a variety of ways. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between Veterans' use of coping strategies and treatment engagement for depression may not be readily apparent without in-depth exploration. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In VA primary care clinics, nurse care managers and behavioral health providers should explore how Veterans' methods of coping may impact treatment engagement. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Evelyn T Chang; Danielle E Rose; Elizabeth M Yano; Kenneth B Wells; Maureen E Metzger; Edward P Post; Martin L Lee; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John Kasckow; Erin Ingram; Charlotte Brown; James D Tew; Kyaien O Conner; Jennifer Q Morse; Gretchen L Haas; Charles F Reynolds; David W Oslin Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Mark Olfson; Steven C Marcus; Benjamin Druss; Lynn Elinson; Terri Tanielian; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-01-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert H Pietrzak; Douglas C Johnson; Marc B Goldstein; James C Malley; Steven M Southwick Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Erin P Finley; Norman Shields; Joan Cook; Rachel Haine-Schlagel; James F Burgess; Linda Dimeff; Kelly Koerner; Michael Suvak; Cassidy A Gutner; David Gagnon; Tasoula Masina; Matthew Beristianos; Kera Mallard; Vanessa Ramirez; Candice Monson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 7.327