Literature DB >> 24314975

Evolution of quality of life in renal transplant recipients and patients with multiple sclerosis: a follow-up study.

E Fernández-Jiménez1, M A Pérez-San-Gregorio, A Martín-Rodríguez, J Pérez-Bernal, G Izquierdo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the evolution of quality of life in 2 medical conditions under immunotherapy (cadaveric renal transplantation [G1] and multiple sclerosis [G2]), and to assess the clinical significance of the results compared with a representative age-adjusted sample of the general Spanish population (G3).
METHODS: Using a mixed design (2 × 2), the SF-36 Health Survey was administered to 60 patients with one of these clinical conditions (30 in each group; the patient group factor), matched for gender, and homogenized regarding age and working status. All renal patients had undergone transplantation 6 months before the first assessment, and all neurological patients presented a relapsing-remitting course and a mild-moderate disability level. Both patient groups were assessed a second time 6 months later (the phase factor). A mixed analysis of covariance was computed controlling for age as a covariate. Cohen's d was reported as an effect size index and to analyze the clinical significance regarding a representative age-adjusted sample of the general Spanish population (n = 5821).
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between patient groups in vitality, bodily pain, social functioning, and mental health (P < .01), in which worse levels were displayed by patients with multiple sclerosis in both phases (Cohen's ds1-2 from 0.61 to 1.40). Likewise, an interactive effect was observed in physical functioning [F(1,57) = 12.93; P = .001], such that the performance of daily physical activities improved in renal recipients after 6 months, but it decreased in neurological patients. Patients with multiple sclerosis showed higher, clinically significant impairment in all SF-36 dimensions in both phases compared with renal recipients (Cohen's ds2-3 from -0.50 to -1.61), who presented clinically significant impairment in general health, role-physical, and role-emotional (Cohen's ds1-3 from -0.73 to -1.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplant recipients need specialized health care 1 year after transplantation because they still display relevant impairment in daily functioning compared with the general population.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24314975     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  3 in total

1.  Quality of sleep and health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hong-Xia Liu; Jun Lin; Xiao-Hong Lin; Linda Wallace; Sha Teng; Shu-Ping Zhang; Yu-Fang Hao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Assessment of physical performance and quality of life in kidney-transplanted patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pasquale Esposito; Francesco Furini; Teresa Rampino; Marilena Gregorini; Lucia Petrucci; Catherine Klersy; Antonio Dal Canton; Elena Dalla Toffola
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-11-10

3.  Depression, Anxiety, Resilience and Coping Pre and Post Kidney Transplantation - Initial Findings from the Psychiatric Impairments in Kidney Transplantation (PI-KT)-Study.

Authors:  Helge H Müller; Matthias Englbrecht; Michael S Wiesener; Stephanie Titze; Katharina Heller; Teja W Groemer; Georg Schett; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Johannes Kornhuber; Juan Manuel Maler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.