Philippe Mahaudens1, Maxime Raison2, Xavier Banse3, Maryline Mousny4, Christine Detrembleur5. 1. Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 12, Ave. Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Institute of NeuroScience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Ave. Mounier, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Philippe.Mahaudens@uclouvain.be. 2. Institute Research Chair in Pediatric Rehabilitation Engineering, École Polytechnique and Centre de Réadaptation Marie Enfant (CRME) Bureau GR-123, 5200 rue Bélanger Est, H1T 1C9 Sainte-Justine, Montréal QC, Canada. 3. Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Ave. Mounier, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. 4. Service d'Orthopédie et de Traumatologie de L'Appareil Locomoteur, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, 12, Ave. Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. 5. Institute of NeuroScience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Ave. Mounier, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A previous study showed subtle biomechanical changes in the gait of unbraced adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients such as a reduction of pelvic, hip, knee, and ankle displacements. However, lumbopelvic muscles' timing activity was bilaterally increased during gait and correlated to excessive oxygen consumption as compared with healthy subjects. Usually, a brace, when indicated, is worn strictly for 22 hours every day in skeletally immature idiopathic scoliotic girls. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the long-term brace effect (6 months) on functional activities such as level walking. PURPOSE: To assess the stiffening effects of 6 months' brace wearing on instrumented gait analysis in girls with thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Clinical prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirteen girls diagnosed as progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with left thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (curves ranging 25°-40°). OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients underwent a radiographic and instrumented gait analysis, including assessment of kinematics, mechanics, electromyography (EMG), and energetics of walking. METHODS: The scoliotic girls were prospectively studied at S1 (before bracing) and 6 months later at S2 (out-brace: treatment effect). The gait parameters were compared with those of 13 matched healthy girls. A t paired test was conducted to evaluate the effect of the 6-month orthotic treatment in AIS girls. Student t test was performed to compare the scoliotic group at S2 and the healthy subjects to identify if the observed changes in gait parameters meant improvement or worsening of gait. RESULTS: After 6 months of orthotic treatment in AIS, thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and apical rotation remained reduced by 25% and 61%, respectively. During gait, frontal pelvis and hip motions were significantly increased. Muscular mechanical work increased becoming closer but still different as compared with healthy subjects. Bilateral lumbopelvic muscles were almost 40% more active in AIS at S1 compared with healthy subjects and did not change at S2 except for the erector spinae muscles EMG activity, which decreased significantly. Energy cost exceeded by 30% in AIS at S1 compared with healthy subjects and did not change at 6 months' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months of orthotic treatment, in an out-brace situation, the main structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curve remained partly corrected. Frontal pelvis and hip motion increased, contributing to an improvement of muscular mechanical work during walking. EMG activity duration of lumbopelvic muscles did not change except for the erector spinae muscles, which was decreased but without any beneficial change in the energy cost of walking. In summary, brace treatment, after 6 months, did not significantly influence the gait variables in AIS girls deleteriously, but did not reduce the excessive energy cost, which was 30% above the values of normal adolescents.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A previous study showed subtle biomechanical changes in the gait of unbraced adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients such as a reduction of pelvic, hip, knee, and ankle displacements. However, lumbopelvic muscles' timing activity was bilaterally increased during gait and correlated to excessive oxygen consumption as compared with healthy subjects. Usually, a brace, when indicated, is worn strictly for 22 hours every day in skeletally immature idiopathic scoliotic girls. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the long-term brace effect (6 months) on functional activities such as level walking. PURPOSE: To assess the stiffening effects of 6 months' brace wearing on instrumented gait analysis in girls with thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: Clinical prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirteen girls diagnosed as progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with left thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (curves ranging 25°-40°). OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients underwent a radiographic and instrumented gait analysis, including assessment of kinematics, mechanics, electromyography (EMG), and energetics of walking. METHODS: The scoliotic girls were prospectively studied at S1 (before bracing) and 6 months later at S2 (out-brace: treatment effect). The gait parameters were compared with those of 13 matched healthy girls. A t paired test was conducted to evaluate the effect of the 6-month orthotic treatment in AIS girls. Student t test was performed to compare the scoliotic group at S2 and the healthy subjects to identify if the observed changes in gait parameters meant improvement or worsening of gait. RESULTS: After 6 months of orthotic treatment in AIS, thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and apical rotation remained reduced by 25% and 61%, respectively. During gait, frontal pelvis and hip motions were significantly increased. Muscular mechanical work increased becoming closer but still different as compared with healthy subjects. Bilateral lumbopelvic muscles were almost 40% more active in AIS at S1 compared with healthy subjects and did not change at S2 except for the erector spinae muscles EMG activity, which decreased significantly. Energy cost exceeded by 30% in AIS at S1 compared with healthy subjects and did not change at 6 months' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months of orthotic treatment, in an out-brace situation, the main structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curve remained partly corrected. Frontal pelvis and hip motion increased, contributing to an improvement of muscular mechanical work during walking. EMG activity duration of lumbopelvic muscles did not change except for the erector spinae muscles, which was decreased but without any beneficial change in the energy cost of walking. In summary, brace treatment, after 6 months, did not significantly influence the gait variables in AIS girls deleteriously, but did not reduce the excessive energy cost, which was 30% above the values of normal adolescents.