Literature DB >> 24314885

Two lessons from a 5-year follow-up study of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: persistent, relevant weight loss and a short surgical learning curve.

Flavien Prevot1, Pierre Verhaeghe1, Aurélien Pequignot1, Lionel Rebibo1, Cyril Cosse1, Abdennaceur Dhahri1, Jean-Marc Regimbeau2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been validated as a bariatric surgery procedure in its own right. However, the few studies of the long-term outcomes of LSG have only featured small patient populations. The objective of the present study was to evaluate weight loss 5 years after LSG and assess the surgical learning curve for this procedure.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of a prospective database including all consecutive patients having undergone LSG at Amiens University Medical Center between November 2004 and July 2007. Data (weight, body mass index [BMI], percentage of excess weight loss [EWL], percentage of excess BMI loss, and percentage weight loss [PWL]) were collected during follow-up (particularly after 5 years).
RESULTS: The study population comprised 118 patients (100 females [85%]; mean ± SD age, 40 ± 11 years; mean preoperative weight, 131 ± 22 kg; mean preoperative BMI, 47.7 ± 7 kg/m(2)). LSG was performed after failure of gastric banding in 23 cases (19%) and after failure of an intragastric balloon in 1 (0.8%). In all, 95 patients (81%) were analyzed ≥60 months after the LSG (mean follow-up period, 71 ± 9 months). The PWL and EWL were 25 ± 14% and 46 ± 26%, respectively. Eleven patients had undergone a second bariatric operation within 5 years of the LSG. Concerning the 84 patients in whom only LSG was the only operation, the PWL and EWL were 23 ± 14% and 43 ± 25%, respectively. The EWL was >50% in 35 of these 84 patients (42%) and between 25 and 50% in 30 cases (36%). Optimal weight results were achieved after only 28 LSG had been performed, which testifies to a shorter learning curve than for most other bariatric surgery techniques.
CONCLUSION: Isolated LSG is a quickly mastered bariatric surgery technique with a short learning curve. It enables a mean PWL of >25% and an EWL of >50% in >40% of cases.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24314885     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  16 in total

1.  Learning curve for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: role of training in a high-volume bariatric center.

Authors:  Giovanni Casella; Emanuele Soricelli; Domenico Giannotti; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Alfredo Genco; Nicola Basso; Adriano Redler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Learning Curve: Clinical and Economical Impact.

Authors:  Sergio Carandina; Laura Montana; Marc Danan; Viola Zulian; Marius Nedelcu; Christophe Barrat
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Stenosis of gastric sleeve after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: clinical, radiographic and endoscopic findings.

Authors:  Jennifer L Levy; Marc S Levine; Stephen E Rubesin; Noel N Williams; Kristoffel R Dumon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

Authors:  F S Wehrtmann; J R de la Garza; K F Kowalewski; M W Schmidt; K Müller; C Tapking; P Probst; M K Diener; L Fischer; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Sleeve gastrectomy revision by endoluminal sleeve plication gastroplasty: a small pilot case series.

Authors:  George Eid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Revisional Surgery After Failed Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Retrospective Analysis of Causes, Results, and Technical Considerations.

Authors:  Huseyin Yilmaz; Ilhan Ece; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Douglas Cheung; Noah J Switzer; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Frattini; Matteo Lavazza; Alberto Mangano; Francesco Amico; Stefano Rausei; Francesca Rovera; Luigi Boni; Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Initial Weight Loss after Restrictive Bariatric Procedures May Predict Mid-Term Weight Maintenance: Results From a 12-Month Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Marko Nikolić; Ivan Kruljac; Lora Kirigin; Gorana Mirošević; Neven Ljubičić; Borka Pezo Nikolić; Miroslav Bekavac-Bešlin; Ivan Budimir; Milan Vrkljan
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 0.607

10.  Gastric Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Sami Hakim; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Thierry Yzet; Richard Delcenserie; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.