Literature DB >> 24314799

The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.

Hakan Aytan1, Ekrem C Tok2, Devrim Ertunc2, Osman Yasa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between episiotomy and measures of pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) in a cohort of women with vaginal parturition. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted with 549 eligible patients with vaginal delivery history. Women who were pregnant, gave birth within the preceding 6 months period, had a known history of pre-pregnant prolapse, had a history of hysterectomy or any operation performed for pelvic organ prolapsus and stress urinary incontinence, refused to participate and to whom POP-Q examination could not be performed (due to anatomic or orthopedic problems) were excluded. Patients were categorized as women with episiotomy and without episiotomy. The degree of genital prolapse was assessed by using POP-Q system. The effect of episiotomy on overall POP-Q stage and individual POP-Q points was calculated with logistic regression.
RESULTS: 439 patients had a history of episiotomy whereas 110 patients had no episiotomy. 38.2% of women without an episiotomy, and 32.0% of women with episiotomy had genital prolapse determined by POP-Q system. There was no statistically significant association between episiotomy and POP-Q stage (AOR, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.65-0.18, P=0.26). Episiotomy was found among the independent predictors for certain POP-Q points such as Bp, perineal body (pb) and total vaginal length (tvl). Episiotomy was negatively correlated with prolapse of Bp and with pb and tvl.
CONCLUSION: Episiotomy had an effect on certain POP-Q indices, but had no influence on overall POP-Q stage.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episiotomy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic organ prolapse quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24314799     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  2 in total

Review 1.  Can We Deliver Better?

Authors:  Ajay Rane; Jay Iyer; Harsha Ananthram; Thomas Currie
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-03-18

2.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of urethrovesical junction mobility: correlation with type of delivery and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Cosimo Cosimato; Lucio M A Cipullo; Jacopo Troisi; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Giovanni Antonio Tommaselli; Rosa Rita Oro; Fulvio Zullo; Vincenzo Altieri; Maurizio Guida
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.