WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The prevailing theory regarding Alzheimer disease (AD) is that insoluble amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) plays a critical role in the cortical plaques characteristic of the disease. Because Aβ is formed from the sequential splicing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) catalysed by 'secretase' enzymes (α, β and γ), clinical trials of secretase inhibitors will either result in beneficial pharmacotherapy or, if negative, cast doubt on the role of Aβ in AD. With recent clinical trial failures, is the Aβ theory wrong? METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on the topics of secretases and clinical trials, including PubMed searches, United States clinical trials directory, pharmaceutical company websites and news reports. The information was collected and evaluated for relevance and quality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Several direct-acting (e.g. CTS-21166, LY2811376) and indirect-acting (e.g. ACI-91) β-secretase inhibitors and several γ-secretase inhibitors (e.g. avagacestat, JNJ-40418677 and semagacestat) have not fared well in early clinical trials due to the lack of efficacy or concerns over possible serious side effects. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The failures of secretase inhibitors in clinical trials appear to bring into question the long-hypothesized association between AD and Aβ production. However, the disease might have been too advanced in these patients to benefit from this type of therapy (mainly preventive). Secretase inhibitors are still being studied, along with new diagnostic tools, with the hope of testing patients earlier, that is, with less advanced disease. If these trials also fail, the prevailing view of the role of Aβ in AD will truly be in doubt.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The prevailing theory regarding Alzheimer disease (AD) is that insoluble amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) plays a critical role in the cortical plaques characteristic of the disease. Because Aβ is formed from the sequential splicing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) catalysed by 'secretase' enzymes (α, β and γ), clinical trials of secretase inhibitors will either result in beneficial pharmacotherapy or, if negative, cast doubt on the role of Aβ in AD. With recent clinical trial failures, is the Aβ theory wrong? METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on the topics of secretases and clinical trials, including PubMed searches, United States clinical trials directory, pharmaceutical company websites and news reports. The information was collected and evaluated for relevance and quality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Several direct-acting (e.g. CTS-21166, LY2811376) and indirect-acting (e.g. ACI-91) β-secretase inhibitors and several γ-secretase inhibitors (e.g. avagacestat, JNJ-40418677 and semagacestat) have not fared well in early clinical trials due to the lack of efficacy or concerns over possible serious side effects. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The failures of secretase inhibitors in clinical trials appear to bring into question the long-hypothesized association between AD and Aβ production. However, the disease might have been too advanced in these patients to benefit from this type of therapy (mainly preventive). Secretase inhibitors are still being studied, along with new diagnostic tools, with the hope of testing patients earlier, that is, with less advanced disease. If these trials also fail, the prevailing view of the role of Aβ in AD will truly be in doubt.
Authors: Alex E Roher; Chera L Maarouf; Tyler A Kokjohn; Charisse M Whiteside; Walter M Kalback; Geidy Serrano; Christine Belden; Carolyn Liebsack; Sandra A Jacobson; Marwan N Sabbagh; Thomas G Beach Journal: Am J Neurodegener Dis Date: 2014-12-05
Authors: Santiago Rivera; Laura García-González; Michel Khrestchatisky; Kévin Baranger Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Marissa J Schafer; Melissa J Alldred; Sang Han Lee; Michael E Calhoun; Eva Petkova; Paul M Mathews; Stephen D Ginsberg Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Leon M Tai; Kevin P Koster; Jia Luo; Sue H Lee; Yue-Ting Wang; Nicole C Collins; Manel Ben Aissa; Gregory R J Thatcher; Mary Jo LaDu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nan Jiang; Leonie H E Leithold; Julia Post; Tamar Ziehm; Jörg Mauler; Lothar Gremer; Markus Cremer; Elena Schartmann; N Jon Shah; Janine Kutzsche; Karl-Josef Langen; Jörg Breitkreutz; Dieter Willbold; Antje Willuweit Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240