Literature DB >> 24312730

Pattern-formation mechanisms in motility mutants of Myxococcus xanthus.

Jörn Starruß1, Fernando Peruani, Vladimir Jakovljevic, Lotte Søgaard-Andersen, Andreas Deutsch, Markus Bär.   

Abstract

Formation of spatial patterns of cells is a recurring theme in biology and often depends on regulated cell motility. Motility of the rod-shaped cells of the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus depends on two motility machineries, type IV pili (giving rise to S-motility) and the gliding motility apparatus (giving rise to A-motility). Cell motility is regulated by occasional reversals. Moving M. xanthus cells can organize into spreading colonies or spore-filled fruiting bodies, depending on their nutritional status. To ultimately understand these two pattern-formation processes and the contributions by the two motility machineries, as well as the cell reversal machinery, we analyse spatial self-organization in three M. xanthus strains: (i) a mutant that moves unidirectionally without reversing by the A-motility system only, (ii) a unidirectional mutant that is also equipped with the S-motility system, and (iii) the wild-type that, in addition to the two motility systems, occasionally reverses its direction of movement. The mutant moving by means of the A-engine illustrates that collective motion in the form of large moving clusters can arise in gliding bacteria owing to steric interactions of the rod-shaped cells, without the need of invoking any biochemical signal regulation. The two-engine strain mutant reveals that the same phenomenon emerges when both motility systems are present, and as long as cells exhibit unidirectional motion only. From the study of these two strains, we conclude that unidirectional cell motion induces the formation of large moving clusters at low and intermediate densities, while it results in vortex formation at very high densities. These findings are consistent with what is known from self-propelled rod models, which strongly suggests that the combined effect of self-propulsion and volume exclusion interactions is the pattern-formation mechanism leading to the observed phenomena. On the other hand, we learn that when cells occasionally reverse their moving direction, as observed in the wild-type, cells form small but strongly elongated clusters and self-organize into a mesh-like structure at high enough densities. These results have been obtained from a careful analysis of the cluster statistics of ensembles of cells, and analysed in the light of a coagulation Smoluchowski equation with fragmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective migration; self-organization; spatio-temporal pattern formation

Year:  2012        PMID: 24312730      PMCID: PMC3499129          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  41 in total

1.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1995-08-07       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Onset of collective and cohesive motion.

Authors:  Guillaume Grégoire; Hugues Chaté
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments.

Authors:  K Kruse; J F Joanny; F Jülicher; J Prost; K Sekimoto
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Large-scale collective properties of self-propelled rods.

Authors:  Francesco Ginelli; Fernando Peruani; Markus Bär; Hugues Chaté
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 5.  Gliding motility revisited: how do the myxobacteria move without flagella?

Authors:  Emilia M F Mauriello; Tâm Mignot; Zhaomin Yang; David R Zusman
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  A self-organized vortex array of hydrodynamically entrained sperm cells.

Authors:  Ingmar H Riedel; Karsten Kruse; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Active nematics are intrinsically phase separated.

Authors:  Shradha Mishra; Sriram Ramaswamy
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Evidence that focal adhesion complexes power bacterial gliding motility.

Authors:  Tâm Mignot; Joshua W Shaevitz; Patricia L Hartzell; David R Zusman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  How myxobacteria glide.

Authors:  Charles Wolgemuth; Egbert Hoiczyk; Dale Kaiser; George Oster
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  "Frizzy" genes of Myxococcus xanthus are involved in control of frequency of reversal of gliding motility.

Authors:  B D Blackhart; D R Zusman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Phase separation and emergent structures in an active nematic fluid.

Authors:  Elias Putzig; Aparna Baskaran
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-10-08

Review 2.  Modelling collective cell motion: are on- and off-lattice models equivalent?

Authors:  Josué Manik Nava-Sedeño; Anja Voß-Böhme; Haralampos Hatzikirou; Andreas Deutsch; Fernando Peruani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Directional reversals enable Myxococcus xanthus cells to produce collective one-dimensional streams during fruiting-body formation.

Authors:  Shashi Thutupalli; Mingzhai Sun; Filiz Bunyak; Kannappan Palaniappan; Joshua W Shaevitz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Large-Scale Vortices with Dynamic Rotation Emerged from Monolayer Collective Motion of Gliding Flavobacteria.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakane; Shoko Odaka; Kana Suzuki; Takayuki Nishizaka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Shared behavioral mechanisms underlie C. elegans aggregation and swarming.

Authors:  Siyu Serena Ding; Linus J Schumacher; Avelino E Javer; Robert G Endres; André Ex Brown
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Non-invasive single-cell morphometry in living bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Mingxing Zhang; Ji Zhang; Yibo Wang; Jie Wang; Alecia M Achimovich; Scott T Acton; Andreas Gahlmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Scattered migrating colony formation in the filamentous cyanobacterium, Pseudanabaena sp. NIES-4403.

Authors:  Hiroki Yamamoto; Yuki Fukasawa; Yu Shoji; Shumpei Hisamoto; Tomohiro Kikuchi; Atsuko Takamatsu; Hideo Iwasaki
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Biophysical aspects underlying the swarm to biofilm transition.

Authors:  Vasco M Worlitzer; Ajesh Jose; Ilana Grinberg; Markus Bär; Sebastian Heidenreich; Avigdor Eldar; Gil Ariel; Avraham Be'er
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Mechanism for Collective Cell Alignment in Myxococcus xanthus Bacteria.

Authors:  Rajesh Balagam; Oleg A Igoshin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.