| Literature DB >> 24312209 |
Anna P Ralph1, Enny Kenangalem, Govert Waramori, Gysje J Pontororing, Emiliana Tjitra, Graeme P Maguire, Paul M Kelly, Nicholas M Anstey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), morbidity during treatment and residual pulmonary disability can be under-estimated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24312209 PMCID: PMC3843655 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Participant characteristics.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 200 | 40 | |
|
| 28 (23-36.5) | 26.5 (23.5-33) | 0.7 |
|
| 69 (34.5) | 9 (22.5) | 0.1 |
|
| 89 (44.5) | 20 (50.0) | 0.5 |
| Female: number (%) | 29 (32.6) | 6 (30.0) | 1.0 |
|
| 109 (55%) | 19 (48%) | 0.4 |
|
| 1.61 (0.01) | 1.58 (0.01) | 0.08 |
|
| 62.5 (1.63) | 48.5 (0.54) | <0.0001 |
|
| 146/186 (79%) | - | - |
|
| 2/149 (1.3) | - | - |
* Outcome category and culture and susceptibility results were unavailable in some participants
Figure 1Proportion of participants reporting symptoms at enrolment and during each week of follow up.
Figure 2Functional, radiological and quality of life measures.
*Data shown only for participants who had measures performed both at enrolment of 6 months (numbers shown in brackets).
A 6 minute walk test (n=107)
B Percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (n=112)
C St George’s respiratory questionnaire total score (n=76)
D X-ray score (n=73)
Associations between baseline measures and residual disability at 6 months.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| HIV- : 3.25 units (1.72-7.18) | 0.02 | |
| HIV+ : 15.8 units (7.01-29.2) | ||
|
| ||
| HIV- : 480m (425-520) | 0.6 | |
| HIV+ : 440m (420-475) | ||
|
|
| |
| Illness duration ≤3 months | 0.04 | |
| Illness duration >3 months: 51.1kg (7.3) | ||
|
| ||
| Illness duration ≤3 months: 6 units (2-14) | 0.05 | |
| Illness duration >3 months: 19 units (6-65) | ||
|
| ||
| Illness duration ≤3 months: 75.4% (15.8) | 0.06 | |
| Illness duration >3 months: 62.9% (18.3) | ||
|
|
| |
| X-ray score ≤70 | <0.0001 | |
| X-ray score >70: 10.5 units (2-19) | ||
|
| ||
| X-ray score ≤70: 78.2% (13.3) | <0.0001 | |
| X-ray score >70: 64.2% (19.1) |
* p values calculated using multivariable logistic regression
† p values calculated using pairwise correlation between continuous variables with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons
‡ continuous explanatory variables have been dichotomised to illustrate differences.
Normal reference ranges for 6 minute walk test and modified (Indonesian) St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire in Timika, Papua, Indonesia .
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Symptom score | 0 (0-21.51) | 0 (0-21.51) | 0 (0-12.39) | 0 (0- 21.51) | 0 (0-13.07) |
| Activity score | 0 (0-12.78) | 0 (0-12.74) | 0 (0-12.78) | 0 (0- 12.78) | 0 (0-0) |
| Impact score | 0 (0-15.1) | 0 (0-15.1) | 0 (0-3.73) | 0 (0- 8.87) | 0 (0-15.1) |
| Total score | 0 (0-9.23) | 0.86 (0-9.23) | 0 (0-7.97) | 1.88 (0- 7.97) | 0 (0-9.23) |
|
| 497 (63) | 511 (60) | 477 (46) | 503 (58) | 490 (69) |
* 6MWD and total SGRQ score summary statistics in these healthy controls, without sex or ethnic group breakdown, have been previously cited [34]
† 6-minute walk test male vs female p=0.006. No other significant differences in SGRQ or 6MWT between sex or ethnic groups.
Figure 3References ranges in healthy volunteers.
A Six minute walk test.
B St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Adverse event rates in a range of study types and locations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Non-severe | 71/123 | 58% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study, Indonesia, 2013 |
| 44/165 | 27% | 31 | Randomised trial | Burman et al, Africa and North America, 2006 [ | |
| Severe | 13/519 | 2% | 44 | Retrospective observational | Schaberg et al, Germany, 1996 [ |
|
| |||||
| Non-severe | 42/129 | 33% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study |
| 15/165 | 9% | 31 | Randomised trial | [ | |
| 1/24 | 4% | 33 | Randomised trial in multi-drug resistant TB | Diacon et al, South Africa, 2009 [ | |
| Severe | 5/519 | 0.9% | 44 | Retrospective observational | [ |
|
| |||||
| Non-severe | 47/171 | 27% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study |
| Severe | 33/519 | 6% | 44 | Retrospective observational | [ |
| 18/430 | 4% | 40 | Retrospective observational | Yee et al, Canada, 2003 [ | |
|
| |||||
| Non-severe | 23/142 | 16% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study |
| 15/165 | 9% | 31 | Randomised trial | [ | |
| 2/24 | 8% | 33 | Randomised trial | [ | |
|
| |||||
| Non-severe | 14/153 | 9% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study |
| 6/165 | 4% | 31 | Randomised trial | [ | |
| 1/24 | 4% | 33 | Randomised trial | [ | |
|
| 2/200 | 1% | 28 | Prospective observational | This study |
| 35/332 | 11% | 31 | Randomised trial | [ | |
| 0/47 | 0% | 33 | Randomised trial | [ | |
| 121/519 | 23% | 44 | Retrospective observational | [ | |
| 51/1149 | 4% | 36 | Retrospective observational | Gulbay et al, Turkey, 2006 [ |
* For the current study, denominators are the subset of the 200 patients who had ≥6 follow up visits, and did not have that symptom at baseline
† For randomised trials, adverse event rates are given for the standard-treatment arm where a novel comparison arm was used
‡ Severe = requiring drug cessation
Figure 4Adverse event rates during TB treatment.